Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38294568›Full record

SynthesisPediatric surgery international2024

Psychological and social impacts on carers of children with a gastrostomy: a systematic review.

Joe Prakash, Caroline Pardy, Iain Yardley, Veronica Kelly

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pediatric surgery international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joe PrakashGKT King's College London Medical School, London, UK.
Caroline PardyDepartment of Paediatric Surgery, Evelina London Children's Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK. caroline.pardy@nhs.net.
Iain YardleyGKT King's College London Medical School, London, UK.
Veronica KellyChildrens Health Ireland, Herberton, St James's Walk, Rialto, D08 HP97, Ireland.
King's College London · GBEvelina London Children's Healthcare · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To determine the psychological and social impacts of a gastrostomy in childhood on carers and families. A systematic search of OVID, Medline and Embase was undertaken using the subject headings and word variants for 'gastrostomy', 'children' and 'carers'. Studies included were those describing the impact of gastrostomies in children on family and carers, published in English. 564 articles were identified. After exclusion of duplicates, abstract and full text screening, 25 were included. Carer anxiety increases in the period leading up to, and for a short period following gastrostomy insertion. 3-6 months following gastrostomy insertion, anxiety reduced (reduced State-Trait Anxiety Inventory scores), carer quality of life improved (higher Quality of Life Scale scores), and carer satisfaction with the child's gastrostomy increased (improved Satisfaction Questionnaire with Gastrostomy Feeding scores). Reported changes in carer quality of life in the longer term following a child's gastrostomy insertion were mixed. The social and psychological burden on caregivers of a gastrostomy in childhood varies over time. There is evidence that paediatric gastrostomies have positive effects on carers' psychological and social well-being; however, aspects of carers' quality of life remain impaired. Carer education and support are vital to reduce the burden placed on carers.

Indexed as

CaregiversGastrostomyChildEnteral NutritionHumansQuality of LifeSocial ChangeCarerGastrostomyPediatricQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID38294568
OpenAlexW4391391600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.