ReviewInnere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany)2024
[Precision medicine enhances personalized medicine in cardiology].
Review in Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Personalized medicine and precision medicine, frequently used synonymously, shall be clearly differentiated. Accordingly, personalization in cardiac medicine is based on the clinical presentation of a patient, as well as his/her cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities, electrocardiography, imaging, and biomarkers for myocardial load and ischemia. Personalization is based on large clinical trials with detailed subgroup analyses and is practiced on the basis of guidelines. Further in depth personalization is achieved by precision medicine, which is based on innovative imaging for myocardial structure, coronary morphology, and electrophysiology. From the clinical perspective, genome analyses are relevant for comparatively rare monogenetic cardiovascular diseases. While these as well as transcriptome and metabolome analyses play a significant role in cardiovascular research with great translation potential, they have not yet been broadly introduced in the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of complex cardiovascular diseases. Furthermore, digital technologies have considerable potential in cardiovascular precision medicine. On the one hand, this is based on the frequency of the diseases with the availability of Big Data and, on the other hand, on the availability of bio-signals and sensors of those signals in cardiovascular diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.