Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38294113›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2024

Tularemia From Veterinary Occupational Exposure.

Grace E Marx, Emily Curren, Marisa Olesen, Laura Cronquist, Levi Schlosser, Matthew Nichols, Maria Bye, Andrea Cote, David W McCormick, Christina A Nelson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Tularemia Antimicrobial Treatment and Prophylaxis: CDC Recommendations for Naturally Acquired Infections and Bioterrorism Response - United States, 2025.MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Non-vaccinal prophylaxis of tularemia.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Grace E MarxCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Emily CurrenWyoming Department of Public Health, Cheyenne, Wyoming, USA.
Marisa OlesenArkos Health, Bismarck, North Dakota, USA.
Laura CronquistNorth Dakota Department of Health and Human Services, Bismarck, North Dakota, USA.
Levi SchlosserNorth Dakota Department of Health and Human Services, Bismarck, North Dakota, USA.
Matthew NicholsOklahoma State Department of Health, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
Maria ByeMinnesota Department of Health, St Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Andrea CoteWyoming Department of Public Health, Cheyenne, Wyoming, USA.
David W McCormickCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Christina A NelsonCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USNorth Dakota Department of Health · USMinnesota Department of Health · USOklahoma State Department of Health · USWaterborne Environmental (United States) · USWyoming State Department of Health · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tularemia is a disease caused by Francisella tularensis, a highly infectious bacteria that can be transmitted to humans by direct contact with infected animals. Because of the potential for zoonotic transmission of F. tularensis, veterinary occupational risk is a concern. Here, we report on a human case of tularemia in a veterinarian after an accidental needlestick injury during abscess drainage in a sick dog. The veterinarian developed ulceroglandular tularemia requiring hospitalization but fully recovered after abscess drainage and a course of effective antibiotics. To systematically assess veterinary occupational transmission risk of F. tularensis, we conducted a survey of veterinary clinical staff after occupational exposure to animals with confirmed tularemia. We defined a high-risk exposure as direct contact to the infected animal's body fluids or potential aerosol inhalation without use of standard personal protective equipment (PPE). Survey data included information on 20 veterinary occupational exposures to animals with F. tularensis in 4 states. Veterinarians were the clinical staff most often exposed (40%), followed by veterinarian technicians and assistants (30% and 20%, respectively). Exposures to infected cats were most common (80%). Standard PPE was not used during 80% of exposures; a total of 7 exposures were categorized as high risk. Transmission of F. tularensis in the veterinary clinical setting is possible but overall risk is likely low. Veterinary clinical staff should use standard PPE and employ environmental precautions when handling sick animals to minimize risk of tularemia and other zoonotic infections; postexposure prophylaxis should be considered after high-risk exposures to animals with suspected or confirmed F. tularensis infection to prevent tularemia.

Indexed as

Francisella tularensisOccupational ExposureTularemiaAbscessAnimalsDogsHumansZoonosesFrancisella tularensisoccupational risktularemiaveterinaryzoonoses

Identifiers

PMID38294113
PMCPMC11831251
OpenAlexW4391388909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.