Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38293995›Full record

Observational studyJournal of the American Heart Association2024

Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock: Outcomes of the RECOVER III Postapproval Study by Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Shock Stage.

Ivan D Hanson, Akash Rusia, Andres Palomo, Adam Tawney, Timothy Pow, Simon R Dixon, Perwaiz Meraj, Eric Sievers, Michael Johnson, David Wohns and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Acute Myocardial Infarction and Stage E Shock: Insights From the RECOVER III Study.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.

Ivan D HansonDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine William Beaumont University Hospital Royal Oak MI.ORCID 0000-0002-0481-9764
Akash RusiaDepartment of Advanced Heart Failure, Baylor Scott & White Health-The Heart Hospital Plano TX.ORCID 0000-0001-8289-448X
Andres PalomoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine William Beaumont University Hospital Royal Oak MI.
Adam TawneyDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine William Beaumont University Hospital Royal Oak MI.ORCID 0000-0001-7803-3126
Timothy PowDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine William Beaumont University Hospital Royal Oak MI.
Simon R DixonDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine William Beaumont University Hospital Royal Oak MI.ORCID 0000-0003-1401-2451
Perwaiz MerajDepartment of Cardiology Northwell Health Manhasset NY.ORCID 0000-0002-6350-4666
Eric SieversDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery Jackson-Madison County Hospital Jackson TN.
Michael JohnsonDepartment of Cardiology Piedmont Augusta Augusta GA.ORCID 0000-0002-4096-7916
David WohnsDivision of Cardiology Spectrum Health Grand Rapids MI.ORCID 0000-0001-6606-2261
Omar AliDepartment of Cardiology Detroit Medical Center Detroit MI.ORCID 0009-0009-0038-6058
Navin K KapurDepartment of Cardiology Tufts University School of Medicine Boston MA.
Cindy GrinesNorthside Hospital Cardiovascular Institute Atlanta GA.ORCID 0000-0003-1653-6443
Daniel BurkhoffCardiovascular Research Foundation New York NY.ORCID 0000-0003-3995-2466
Mark AndersonDepartment of Cardiac Surgery Hackensack University Medical Center Hackensack NJ.
Alexandra LanskyYale New Haven Hospital New Haven CT.
Srihari S NaiduDepartment of Cardiology Westchester Medical Center and New York Medical College Valhalla NY.
Mir B BasirDivision of Cardiology Henry Ford Hospital Detroit MI.ORCID 0000-0003-3486-6753
William O'NeillDivision of Cardiology Henry Ford Hospital Detroit MI.ORCID 0009-0000-5896-728X
Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak · USHenry Ford Hospital · USAugusta University · USCardiovascular Research Foundation · USDetroit Medical Center · USHackensack University Medical Center · USHeart Hospital Baylor Plano · USJackson-Madison County General Hospital · USNorthside Hospital · USNorthwell Health · USSpectrum Health · USTufts University · USWestchester Medical Center · USYale New Haven Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions proposed a staging system (A-E) to predict prognosis in cardiogenic shock. Herein, we report clinical outcomes of the RECOVER III study for the first time, according to Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions shock classification. METHODS AND

resultsThe RECOVER III study is an observational, prospective, multicenter, single-arm, postapproval study of patients with acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with Impella support. Patients enrolled in the RECOVER III study were assigned a baseline Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions shock stage. Staging was then repeated within 24 hours after initiation of Impella. Kaplan-Meier survival curve analyses were conducted to assess survival across Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions shock stages at both time points. At baseline assessment, 16.5%, 11.4%, and 72.2% were classified as stage C, D, and E, respectively. At ≤24-hour assessment, 26.4%, 33.2%, and 40.0% were classified as stage C, D, and E, respectively. Thirty-day survival among patients with stage C, D, and E shock at baseline was 59.7%, 56.5%, and 42.9%, respectively (

conclusionsIn a real-world cohort of patients with acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with Impella support, only stage E classification at ≤24 hours was significantly predictive of mortality, suggesting that response to therapy may be more important than clinical severity of shock at presentation.

Indexed as

Heart-Assist DevicesMyocardial InfarctionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionAngiographyHumansProspective StudiesShock, CardiogenicTreatment Outcomeacute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shockcardiogenic shockmechanical circulatory supportpercutaneous coronary interventionSociety for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions shock class

Identifiers

PMID38293995
PMCPMC11056148
OpenAlexW4391388170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.