Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38293921›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2024

Dynamic Prognosis Prediction for Patients on DAPT After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: Model Development and Validation.

Fang Li, Laila Rasmy, Yang Xiang, Jingna Feng, Ahmed Abdelhameed, Xinyue Hu, Zenan Sun, David Aguilar, Abhijeet Dhoble, Jingcheng Du and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Fang LiMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston TX USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8865-7717
Laila RasmyMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston TX USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2644-4908
Yang XiangPeng Cheng Laboratory Shenzhen Guangdong China.ORCID 0000-0003-1395-6805
Jingna FengMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston TX USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0434-2513
Ahmed AbdelhameedMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston TX USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9970-2517
Xinyue HuMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston TX USA.ORCID 0009-0006-2685-951X
Zenan SunMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston TX USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1577-874X
David AguilarDepartment of Internal Medicine, McGovern Medical School University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston TX USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0916-2722
Abhijeet DhobleDepartment of Internal Medicine, McGovern Medical School University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston TX USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8244-274X
Jingcheng DuMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston TX USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0322-4566
Qing WangMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston TX USA.ORCID 0009-0004-8878-8652
Shuteng NiuMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston TX USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1069-9236
Yifang DangMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston TX USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4014-2957
Xinyuan ZhangMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston TX USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3519-7515
Ziqian XieMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston TX USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6541-1773
Yi NianMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston TX USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4387-5574
JianPing HeMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston TX USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4059-9455
Yujia ZhouMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston TX USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0889-2261
Jianfu LiMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston TX USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9949-7007
Mattia ProsperiData Intelligence Systems Lab, Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Professions & College of Medicine University of Florida Gainesville FL USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9021-5595
Jiang BianDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine University of Florida Gainesville FL USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2238-5429
Degui ZhiMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston TX USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7754-1890
Cui TaoMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston TX USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4267-1924

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rapid evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) in conjunction with recent updates in dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) management guidelines emphasizes the necessity for innovative models to predict ischemic or bleeding events after drug-eluting stent implantation. Leveraging AI for dynamic prediction has the potential to revolutionize risk stratification and provide personalized decision support for DAPT management. METHODS AND

resultsWe developed and validated a new AI-based pipeline using retrospective data of drug-eluting stent-treated patients, sourced from the Cerner Health Facts data set (n=98 236) and Optum's de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart Database (n=9978). The 36 months following drug-eluting stent implantation were designated as our primary forecasting interval, further segmented into 6 sequential prediction windows. We evaluated 5 distinct AI algorithms for their precision in predicting ischemic and bleeding risks. Model discriminative accuracy was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, among other metrics. The weighted light gradient boosting machine stood out as the preeminent model, thus earning its place as our AI-DAPT model. The AI-DAPT demonstrated peak accuracy in the 30 to 36 months window, charting an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 90% [95% CI, 88%-92%] for ischemia and 84% [95% CI, 82%-87%] for bleeding predictions.

conclusionsOur AI-DAPT excels in formulating iterative, refined dynamic predictions by assimilating ongoing updates from patients' clinical profiles, holding value as a novel smart clinical tool to facilitate optimal DAPT duration management with high accuracy and adaptability.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseDrug-Eluting StentsMyocardial InfarctionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionArtificial IntelligenceDrug Therapy, CombinationHemorrhageHumansPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomePlatelet Aggregation Inhibitorsartificial intelligencecoronary artery diseasedrug‐eluting stent implantationdual anti‐platelet therapydynamic prediction

Identifiers

PMID38293921
PMCPMC11056175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.