SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2023
Emerging trends and thematic evolution of immunotherapy for glioma based on the top 100 cited articles.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Research hotspots and development trends ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Pooled it
- The top 100 most cited articles on mucopolysaccharidoses: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Pooled it
- Tracing scientific progress: thematic shifts and emerging directions in proton therapy for glioma based on top-cited papers.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Departments of Neurosurgery are Leaders in Highly Cited Glioblastoma Research.Neurosurgery practice · 2025Review
- Trends in the immunotherapy for glioblastoma: A two-decade bibliometric analysis.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
- Application Value and Research Frontiers of Immunotherapy in Glioblastoma: A Bibliometric and Visualized Analysis.Oncology research · 2025Review
- Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease: bibliometric analysis of the top 100 cited literature.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to depict the scientific advancements in immunotherapy for glioma by analyzing the top 100 most frequently cited articles over the past 20 years. Methods: The top 100 most influential papers in immunotherapy for glioma were identified from the Web of Science Core Collection. Citations, countries/regions, institutions, journals, authorships, keywords, and references were extracted and analyzed by CiteSpace, VOSviewer, R software, and an online bibliometric platform. Results: The United States possessed a robust global presence, leading in terms of publications and maintaining strong collaborative ties with numerous countries. The institution that made the greatest contributions was Duke University, with 16 papers. Heimberger AB, Sampson JH, and Reardon DA secured the top three positions with 15, 12, and 11 papers, respectively. "Macrophage ontogeny," "microglia," "polarization," "mass cytometry," "tumor mutation burden," "sensitivity," "msh6," "pd-1 blockade," and "dna repair" were the recent hot keywords. "Microglia" and "polarization" as the emerging research directions should be given more consideration. Conclusions: This is the first bibliometric analysis to identify the top 100 papers on immunotherapy for glioma. "Microglia" and "polarization" will be hot spots for future research. The clinical efficacy of glioma immunotherapy is not yet satisfactory, and there is an urgent need to search for more tumor specific antigens and targets that can assist in early diagnosis, precise treatment, prognosis, and recurrence prediction of glioma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.