Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38293545›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Methodological choices in size and density fractionation of soil carbon reserves - A case study on wood fiber sludge amended soils.

Riikka Keskinen, Johanna Nikama, Joel Kostensalo, Mari Räty, Kimmo Rasa, Helena Soinne

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Riikka KeskinenNatural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE), Tietotie 4, FI-31600, Jokioinen, Finland.
Johanna NikamaNatural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE), Tietotie 4, FI-31600, Jokioinen, Finland.
Joel KostensaloNatural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE), Yliopistokatu 6 B, FI-80100, Joensuu, Finland.
Mari RätyNatural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE), Halolantie 31 A, FI-71750, Maaninka Finland.
Kimmo RasaNatural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE), Tietotie 4, FI-31600, Jokioinen, Finland.
Helena SoinneNatural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE), Latokartanonkaari 9, FI-00790 Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil organic carbon (SOC) is in the focus of research due to its central role in regulating climate and maintaining fertility and resilience of soils. Methodologically, shifting from whole soil C measurements to specific SOC fractions increases possibility to detect small changes in the vast SOC storage, and enhances estimation of SOC stability. However, SOC fractionation schemes are numerous and variable. In this study, deionized water and sodium hexametaphosphate (SHMP) were compared in soil dispersion by separating soils into coarse (0.25-2 mm), medium (0.063-0.25 mm) and fine (<0.063 mm) size fractions. The first two fractions were further separated by density (1.8 g cm

Indexed as

Carbon storageMethod developmentOrganic amendmentsSoil conditioning

Identifiers

PMID38293545
PMCPMC10826313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.