ReviewHeliyon2024
Fluorescence visualization for cancer DETECTION: EXPERIENCE and perspectives.
Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Calixarene-Based Nanostructures for Delivering Coumarin 6 for Tumor-Cell Imaging and Photoinduced Toxicity.ACS applied nano materials · 2026Article
- Review
- Fluorescent Peptides Internalize HeLa Cells and Kill Multidrug-Resistant Clinical Bacterial Isolates.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Review
- Dual-Labeled Small Peptides in Cancer Imaging and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery: Progress and Future Perspectives.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Cutting-edge insights: near-infrared imaging for surgical margin assessment in head and neck tumor resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current review focuses on the latest advances in the improvement and application of fluorescence imaging technology. Near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging is a promising new technique that uses non-specific fluorescent agents and targeted fluorescent tracers combined with a dedicated camera to better navigate and visualize tumors. Fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) is used to perform various tasks, helping the surgeon to distinguish lymphatic vessels and nodes from surrounding tissues easily and quickly assess the perfusion of the planned resection area, including intraoperative visualization of metastases. The results of the insertion of fluorescence visualization as an auxiliary method to cancer detection and high-risk metastatic lesions in clinical practice have demonstrated enthusiastic results and huge potential. However, intraoperative fluorescence visualization must not be considered as a main diagnostic or treatment method but as an aid to the surgeon. Thus, fluorescence study does not dispense the diagnostic gold standards of benign or malignant tumors (conventional examination, biopsy, ultrasonography and computed tomography, etc.) and can be done usually during intraoperative treatment. Moreover, as fluorescence surgery and fluorescence diagnostic techniques continue to improve, it is likely that they will evolve towards targeted fluorescence imaging probes that will increasingly target a specific type of cancer cell. The most important point remains the search for highly selective messengers of fluorescent labels, which make it possible to identify tumor cells exclusively in the affected organs and indicate to surgeons the boundaries of their spread and metastasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.