Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38293471›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Revisiting the psychometric properties of the McArthur admission experience survey: Validating the Portuguese version using a bifactor approach.

Deborah Oyine Aluh, Sofia Azeredo-Lopes, Barbara Pedrosa, Manuela Silva, Ugnė Grigaitė, Ana Rita Martins, Maria Ferreira de Almeida Mousinho, Graça Cardoso, José Miguel Caldas-de-Almeida

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Deborah Oyine AluhLisbon Institute of Global Mental Health, Lisbon, Portugal.
Sofia Azeredo-LopesComprehensive Health Research Centre (chrc), NOVA Medical School, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Barbara PedrosaLisbon Institute of Global Mental Health, Lisbon, Portugal.
Manuela SilvaLisbon Institute of Global Mental Health, Lisbon, Portugal.
Ugnė GrigaitėLisbon Institute of Global Mental Health, Lisbon, Portugal.
Ana Rita MartinsCentro Hospitalar De Vila Nova De Gaia/Espinho, E.P.E.| V. N. Gaia/Espinho Hospital Centre, Portugal.
Maria Ferreira de Almeida MousinhoDepartment of Mental Health Unidade Local de Saúde do Baixo Alentejo, Beja, Portugal.
Graça CardosoLisbon Institute of Global Mental Health, Lisbon, Portugal.
José Miguel Caldas-de-AlmeidaLisbon Institute of Global Mental Health, Lisbon, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cultural factors play a significant role in shaping the perception of coercion during psychiatric admissions. The present study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the Portuguese Admission Experience Survey(P-AES). The study employed a cross-sectional approach in five psychiatric departments in three regions of Portugal. A total of 208 patients participated in the survey. Reliability was assessed through internal consistency and test-retest procedures. Internal validity was analyzed using a two-parameter logistic item response model, exploring three models, including a bifactor model. Convergent validity was determined by correlating AES scores with the Coercion Ladder (CL), Client Assessment of Satisfaction (CAT), and Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scale. Discriminatory power was assessed by comparing scores between patients with voluntary and involuntary admission status. The P-AES demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The bifactor model exhibited superior fit compared to the one-factor and three-factor models. Correlations between P-AES and CL, as well as CAT scores, indicated good convergent validity. Additionally, P-AES scores were notably higher in patients with compulsory psychiatric hospital admission compared to those admitted voluntarily, confirming its discriminatory power. The bifactor model suggests that all three domains of the AES should be used to measure the subjective experience of coercion.

Indexed as

Bifactor modelMcArthur admission experience surveyPerceived coercionPortuguesePsychometricValidation

Identifiers

PMID38293471
PMCPMC10827453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.