Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38293412›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Gamma radiation vs high pressure pretreatment on physicochemical characteristics of rice bran hydrolysate.

Sikarin Masamran, Supattra Supawong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sikarin MasamranDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Thammasat University, 99 Klong Nueng, Klong Luang, Pathumthani 12121, Thailand.
Supattra SupawongDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Thammasat University, 99 Klong Nueng, Klong Luang, Pathumthani 12121, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of using gamma radiation and high-pressure processing as pretreatment, to consider the structural and amino acid composition changes in rice bran hydrolysate (RBH). The extraction yield and degree of hydrolysis of the irradiated sample were greater than those of the pressurized and control samples, which radiation at 10 kGy gave 31 % yield. Protein content of the control was the highest at 36.1 %, with 32.4 % in pressurized sample at 500 MPa. Control had the highest concentration of total and branched-chain amino acids, with a value of 25,834 mg/100g. Before and after extraction, the microstructure changed visibly and protein agglomeration can be significantly induced by applying a high-pressure. Therefore, this study showed the potential of using both pretreatment methods prior to enzymolysis extraction, with radiation producing more extract. High-pressure produced more protein content, but neither method produced any difference in amino acid content.

Indexed as

Defatted rice branGamma radiationHigh pressure technologyPhysicochemical characteristicsProtein hydrolysate

Identifiers

PMID38293412
PMCPMC10825425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.