Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38293407›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

The gingival phenotypes and related clinical periodontal parameters in a cohort of Pakistani young adults.

Yousuf Moosa, Lakshman Samaranayake, Pagaporn Pantuwadee Pisarnturakit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yousuf MoosaDepartment of Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Lakshman SamaranayakeFaculty of Dentistry, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Pagaporn Pantuwadee PisarnturakitDepartment of Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the gingival phenotypes of healthy young adult Pakistanis attending a dental institution. Methods: A cross-sectional study of gingival phenotype, probing depth (PD), papilla height (PH), gingival width (GW), gingival thickness (GT), crown width (CW) and crown length (CL) of maxillary central incisors was conducted in 510 healthy, Pakistani young adults, aged 20-35 years, attending a regional dental hospital in Pakistan. The K-means clustering technique was employed to delineate clusters based on the characteristics of the periodontal phenotypes. The resultant data was compared with the available international findings. Results: Three quarters (76 %) of the 510 patients examined exhibited a thick gingival phenotype, and the remainder a thin phenotype. The K-means clustering deployed the individual into three different clusters 1, 2 and 3, with varying ratios of PD, GW, CW/CL, with significant variations across the three clusters (p < 0.05). Our data where a vast majority of the cohort exhibited a thick gingival phenotype is comparable to most of the populations sampled in other regions of the world. Conclusion: Taken together the current data, a first for a Pakistani population, indicate that healthy, young adult Pakistanis had differing gingival phenotypes and crown forms, with the thick gingival phenotype predominating. These results are similar to reports from most other regions of the world. However, a larger study with a broader swathe of the Pakistani population is required to derive country specific data on the subject.

Indexed as

GingivaImplantPeriodontiumPhenotypeRecessionYoung adult

Identifiers

PMID38293407
PMCPMC10826647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.