Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38293393›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

IOTA simple rules: An efficient tool for evaluation of ovarian tumors by non-experienced but trained examiners - A prospective study.

Nguyet Dang Thi Minh, Thi Nguyen Van, Huu Duong Duc, Minh Nguyen Tuan, Giang Duong Thi Tra, Dat Do Tuan, Duc Nguyen Tai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound models for assessment of ovarian tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nguyet Dang Thi MinhDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hanoi Medical University, 1 Ton That Tung Street, Dong Da District, Hanoi, 100000, Viet Nam.
Thi Nguyen VanDepartment of Quan Su Radiology, K Hospital 43 Quan su Street, Hoan Kiem district, Hanoi, 100000, Viet Nam.
Huu Duong DucDepartment of Quan Su Radiology, K Hospital 43 Quan su Street, Hoan Kiem district, Hanoi, 100000, Viet Nam.
Minh Nguyen TuanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hanoi Medical University, 1 Ton That Tung Street, Dong Da District, Hanoi, 100000, Viet Nam.
Giang Duong Thi TraDepartment of Delivery, Hanoi Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, 929 La Thanh Street, Ba Dinh district, Hanoi, 100000, Viet Nam.
Dat Do TuanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hanoi Medical University, 1 Ton That Tung Street, Dong Da District, Hanoi, 100000, Viet Nam.
Duc Nguyen TaiPrenatal screening and diagnostic center, Hanoi Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, 929 La Thanh Street, Ba Dinh district, Hanoi, 100000, Viet Nam.
Hanoi Medical University · VNHanoi University of Pharmacy · VN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: A simple and efficient tool for evaluating ovarian tumors in general hospitals where radiologists without experience in gynecological ultrasound is necessary. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of IOTA simple rules in initial classification of ovarian tumors by non-experienced examiners who have received simple training. Materials and method: A prospective single-center study was conducted at Hanoi Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital. Three resident gynecologists trained themselves for two weeks and then received hands-on practice under the supervision of experts for another two weeks. The examiners performed ultrasound on 424 eligible women scheduled for surgery for ovarian tumors and classified the tumors based on IOTA simple rules. The postoperative pathology of ovarian tumors was used as the gold standard. Results: 90.8 % (385/424) of the tumors were benign. Simple rules were applicable in 399/424 (94.1 %) tumors, with a sensitivity of 84.8 % (95 % CI, 70.2-94.3), specificity of 98.9 % (95 % CI, 97.5-99.7), positive predictive value of 87.5 % (95 % CI, 73.3-95.9), and negative predictive value of 98.6 % (95 % CI, 97.1-99.5). The sensitivity of IOTA simple rules was higher in postmenopausal women (91.7 % vs. 81.0 %), while the specificity was higher in premenopausal women (99.4 % vs. 95.8 %). Accuracy was 100 % in all ten pregnant women were assessed using these rules. Conclusion: In conclusion, in the hands of non-expert examiners who were trained thoroughly, IOTA simple rules are a simple and efficient tool for clinical practice in centers where expert radiologists in gynecology are not always available. The training program is simple and could be applied widely in other clinical centers. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of the IOTA simple rules in assessing ovarian tumors among pregnant women.

Indexed as

IOTA simple rulesNon-expert examinerOvarian tumorTrainingVietnam

Identifiers

PMID38293393
PMCPMC10827489
OpenAlexW4390646429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.