ArticleHeliyon2024
Utility of metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for simultaneously detecting pathogens and neoplasms.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Nanopore Sequencing Technology: A Reliable Method for Pathogen Diagnosis in Elderly Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia.Infection and drug resistance · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Clinicians often face the challenge of differentially diagnosing febrile patients who are suspected of infectious diseases, since the clinical manifestations of infection and cancer may overlap. A single test that can detect both pathogens and tumor could provide timely and accurate diagnostic clues to aid the treatment and management of these patients. Methods: We enrolled eight patients to evaluate the utility of metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for simultaneously detecting pathogens and neoplasms using body fluids and tissue samples. Patients were selected by the following criteria: 1) Tumor was not considered upon hospitalization, but mNGS testing indicated neoplasm; 2) Tumor was not excluded, but microbial infection was primarily suspected according to initial clinical assessment. Results: We detected potential pathogens in five patients, three of whom had progressed into critical infections. Moreover, abnormal chromosomal copy numbers were identified in all patients that indicated presence of neoplasms, which were pathologically confirmed. Conclusions: Although copy number variations do not render a definitive cancer diagnosis, it can prompt clinicians to conduct more focused diagnostic testing for cancer, potentially saving time and cost. As a result, integrating copy number analysis with pathogen detection in mNGS may help establish rapid and accurate diagnosis for febrile patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.