Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38293346›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Replacement of failed items in a two commodity retrial queueing-inventory system with multi-component demand and vacation interruption.

K Jeganathan, V Anzen Koffer, K Lakshmanan, K Loganathan, Mohamed Abbas, A Shilpa

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

K JeganathanRamanujan Institute for Advanced Study in Mathematics, University of Madras, Chennai, 600005, India.
V Anzen KofferRamanujan Institute for Advanced Study in Mathematics, University of Madras, Chennai, 600005, India.
K LakshmananDepartment of Mathematics, St. Joseph University, Dimapur, Nagaland, 797115, India.
K LoganathanDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Manipal University Jaipur, Jaipur, 303007, Rajasthan, India.
Mohamed AbbasElectrical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia.
A ShilpaMLR Institute of Technology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates a crucial aspect of inventory management, which is the process of replacing failed items. In dynamic commercial environments, it is essential to efficiently and strategically replace failed items to maintain operational efficiency and ensure profitability. We consider a two-commodity retrial queueing-inventory system with vacation interruption. Upon purchasing the first commodity, the second commodity is provided as a complimentary item. In contrast, no item is given as a complimentary for the purchase of the second item. Only the first commodity is stored in a dedicated pooled storage for replacement when it fails. The

Indexed as

Classical retrial policyMatrix-geometric solutionStability conditionSteady state probability vector

Identifiers

PMID38293346
PMCPMC10825305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.