Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38293271›Full record

ArticleMortality (Abingdon, England)2024

Talking about death and dying: Findings from deliberative discussion groups with members of the public.

Eleanor Wilson, Glenys Caswell, Nicola Turner, Kristian Pollock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mortality (Abingdon, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eleanor WilsonNCARE, School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0419-5901
Glenys CaswellNCARE, School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8246-8189
Nicola TurnerNCARE, School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0870-8324
Kristian PollockNCARE, School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6836-8595

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Talking about death and dying is promoted in UK health policy and practice, from a perception that to do so encourages people to plan for their end of life and so increase their likelihood of experiencing a good death. This encouragement occurs alongside a belief that members of the public are reluctant to talk about death, although surveys suggest this is not the case. This paper describes findings from a research study in which people participated in deliberative discussion groups during which they talked about a range of topics related to death, including talking about death, the good death, choice and planning and compassionate communities. Here we report what they had to say in relation to talking about death and dying. We identified three themes: 1. The difference between talking about death as an abstract concept and confronting the certainty of death, 2. how death and dying presents issues for planning and responsibility, and 3. approaches to normalising death within society. For our participants, planning was considered most appropriate in relation to wills and funerals, while dying was considered too unpredictable to be easy to plan for; they had complex ideas about the value of talking about death and dying.

Indexed as

Deliberative discussion groupsdenial of deathnormalising death talkplanning for deathtalking about death and dying

Identifiers

PMID38293271
PMCPMC10824017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.