Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38293260›Full record

Trial reportWorld journal of orthopedics2024

Scoliocorrector Fatma-UI for correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Development, effectivity, safety and functional outcome.

Phedy Phedy, Ismail Hadisoebroto Dilogo, Wresti Indriatmi, Sugeng Supriadi, Marcel Prasetyo, Fitri Octaviana, Zairin Noor

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in World journal of orthopedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Direct vertebral rotation in idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Phedy PhedyDoctoral Program in Medical Sciences Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia, Jakarta Pusat 10430, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia. Phedy.phe@gmail.com.
Ismail Hadisoebroto DilogoDepartment of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta 10430, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia.
Wresti IndriatmiDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia, Jakarta Pusat 10430, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia.
Sugeng SupriadiFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Indonesia, Depok 16424, Jawa Barat, Indonesia.
Marcel PrasetyoDepartment of Radiology, University of Indonesia, Jakarta Pusat 10430, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia.
Fitri OctavianaDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia, Jakarta Pusat 10430, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia.
Zairin NoorResearch Center for Osteoporosis, Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Lambung Mangkurat University, Banjarmasin 70123, Kalimantan Selatan, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdolescent idiopathic scoliosis remains a major problem due to its high incidence, high risk, and high cost. One of the aims of the management in scoliosis is to correct the deformity. Many techniques are available to correct scoliosis deformity; however, they are all far from ideal to achieve three-dimensional correction in scoliosis.

aimTo develop a set of tools named Scoliocorrector Fatma-UI (SCFUI) to aid three-dimensional correction and to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and functional outcome.

methodsThis study consists of two stages. In the first stage, we developed the SCFUI and tested it in finite element and biomechanical tests. The second stage was a single-blinded randomized clinical trial to evaluate the SCFUI compared to direct vertebral rotation (DVR). Forty-four subjects with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were randomly allocated into the DVR group (

resultsFinite element revealed the maximum stress of the SCFUI components to be between 31.2 - 252 MPa. Biomechanical analysis revealed the modulus elasticity of SCFUI was 9561324 ± 633277 MPa. Both groups showed improvement in Cobb angle and sagittal profile, however the rotation angle was lower in the SCFUI group (11.59 ± 7.46

conclusionWe concluded that SCFUI developed in this study resulted in similar coronal and sagittal but better rotational correction compared to DVR. The safety and functional outcomes were also similar to DVR.

Indexed as

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosisDirect vertebral rotationPosteromedial translationScoliocorrector Fatma-UIScoliosis surgery

Identifiers

PMID38293260
PMCPMC10824068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.