ArticleFrontiers in chemistry2023
Elucidating the binding mechanism of SARS-CoV-2 NSP6-TBK1 and structure-based designing of phytocompounds inhibitors for instigating the host immune response.
Article in Frontiers in chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Deciphering Mutational Impacts on c-Src-HK2 Interaction in Colorectal Cancer Progression, and Identification of Potential Phytocompounds Inhibitors: A Molecular Simulation and Free Energy Calculation Approach.Current medicinal chemistry · 2026Article
- NSP6 of SARS-CoV-2 Dually Regulates Autophagic-Lysosomal Degradation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Molecular modeling to design a multiepitope vaccine against emerging tick-borne Yezo virus and its validation through biophysics techniques.In silico pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2, also referred to as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, is the virus responsible for causing COVID-19, an infectious disease that emerged in Wuhan, China, in December 2019. Among its crucial functions, NSP6 plays a vital role in evading the human immune system by directly interacting with a receptor called TANK-binding kinase (TBK1), leading to the suppression of IFNβ production. Consequently, in the present study we used the structural and biophysical approaches to analyze the effect of newly emerged mutations on the binding of NSP6 and TBK1. Among the identified mutations, four (F35G, L37F, L125F, and I162T) were found to significantly destabilize the structure of NSP6. Furthermore, the molecular docking analysis highlighted that the mutant NSP6 displayed its highest binding affinity with TBK1, exhibiting docking scores of -1436.2 for the wildtype and -1723.2, -1788.6, -1510.2, and -1551.7 for the F35G, L37F, L125F, and I162T mutants, respectively. This suggests the potential for an enhanced immune system evasion capability of NSP6. Particularly, the F35G mutation exhibited the strongest binding affinity, supported by a calculated binding free energy of -172.19 kcal/mol. To disrupt the binding between NSP6 and TBK1, we conducted virtual drug screening to develop a novel inhibitor derived from natural products. From this screening, we identified the top 5 hit compounds as the most promising candidates with a docking score of -6.59 kcal/mol, -6.52 kcal/mol, -6.32 kcal/mol, -6.22 kcal/mol, and -6.21 kcal/mol. The molecular dynamic simulation of top 3 hits further verified the dynamic stability of drugs-NSP6 complexes. In conclusion, this study provides valuable insight into the higher infectivity of the SARS-CoV-2 new variants and a strong rationale for the development of novel drugs against NSP6.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.