Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38293124›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

Dynamical models reveal anatomically reliable attractor landscapes embedded in resting state brain networks.

Ruiqi Chen, Matthew Singh, Todd S Braver, ShiNung Ching

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ruiqi ChenDivision of Biology and Biomedical Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63108.ORCID 0000-0001-7770-9307
Matthew SinghDepartment of Electrical and Systems Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63108.ORCID 0000-0003-0051-336X
Todd S BraverDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63108.ORCID 0000-0002-2631-3393
ShiNung ChingDepartment of Electrical and Systems Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63108.ORCID 0000-0003-4063-7068

Funding

SCH: Tracking Individual Brain State Trajectories: Methods and Applications in Precision Neurocritical CareR01NS130693 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CHING, SHINUNG, GUERRIERO, REJEAN M · 2022 to 2025
$1.2M
Cognitive enhancement through model-based and individualized neurostimulationR21MH132240 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BRAVER, TODD S, CHING, SHINUNG · 2023 to 2024
$429k
NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH132240NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS130693
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analyses of functional connectivity (FC) in resting-state brain networks (RSNs) have generated many insights into cognition. However, the mechanistic underpinnings of FC and RSNs are still not well-understood. It remains debated whether resting state activity is best characterized as noise-driven fluctuations around a single stable state, or instead, as a nonlinear dynamical system with nontrivial attractors embedded in the RSNs. Here, we provide evidence for the latter, by constructing whole-brain dynamical systems models from individual resting-state fMRI (rfMRI) recordings, using the Mesoscale Individualized NeuroDynamic (MINDy) platform. The MINDy models consist of hundreds of neural masses representing brain parcels, connected by fully trainable, individualized weights. We found that our models manifested a diverse taxonomy of nontrivial attractor landscapes including multiple equilibria and limit cycles. However, when projected into anatomical space, these attractors mapped onto a limited set of canonical RSNs, including the default mode network (DMN) and frontoparietal control network (FPN), which were reliable at the individual level. Further, by creating convex combinations of models, bifurcations were induced that recapitulated the full spectrum of dynamics found via fitting. These findings suggest that the resting brain traverses a diverse set of dynamics, which generates several distinct but anatomically overlapping attractor landscapes. Treating rfMRI as a unimodal stationary process (i.e., conventional FC) may miss critical attractor properties and structure within the resting brain. Instead, these may be better captured through neural dynamical modeling and analytic approaches. The results provide new insights into the generative mechanisms and intrinsic spatiotemporal organization of brain networks.

Indexed as

BifurcationsDynamical systems modelingIndividual differencesResting state fMRIResting state networks

Identifiers

PMID38293124
PMCPMC10827065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.