ArticleSurgery open science2024
Non-stapled, total laparoscopic Roux-en-Y anastomosis: A safe and effective procedure for radical pediatric choledochal cyst excision.
Article in Surgery open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic or robot-assisted surgery has become the main pediatric minimal invasive surgery for a choledochal cyst (CDC). However, the Roux-en-Y jejunal limb was created extracorporeally in most reports and intracorporeally in a few reports using an endoscopic stapler. Objectives/methods: To investigate the safety and feasibility of non-stapled laparoscopic Roux-en-Y reconstruction in the radical treatment of congenital choledochal cysts (CDC). Between January 2019 and February 2023, 40 patients diagnosed with CDC underwent non-stapled laparoscopic Roux-en-Y reconstruction (non-stapled totally laparoscopic radical treatment, NTLR), 40 patients underwent conventional reconstruction (conventional laparoscopic radical treatment, CLR) included as control. Their clinical data such as intraoperative blood loss, proportion of transit laparotomy, length of operation, postoperative fasting times, postoperative drainage time, postoperative hospital stay, hospitalization cost, and postoperative complications were retrospectively analyzed. Conclusion: non-stapled laparoscopic Roux-en-Y reconstruction is feasible and safe in total laparoscopic radical treatment of CDC. It may have the following advantages: rapid recovery of postoperative gastrointestinal function, short hospitalization, no age limit on the patient and no additional hospitalization costs, which is worthy of promotion and application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.