Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38292946›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

Efficacy and Safety of Palivizumab as a Prophylaxis for Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Disease: An Updated Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Khaled El-Atawi, Daniele De Luca, Ranagasamy Ramanathan, Manuel Sanchez Luna, Saad Alsaedi, Muzafar Gani Abdul Wahab, Moataz Hamdi, Maysa Saleh

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. RSV: an overview of infection in adults.Pneumonia (Nathan Qld.) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 7 countries.

Khaled El-AtawiDepartment of Pediatrics, Latifa Women and Children Hospital, Dubai, ARE.
Daniele De LucaDivision of Pediatrics and Neonatal Critical Care, "Antoine Béclère" Hospital, Paris Saclay University Hospitals, APHP (Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris), Paris, FRA.
Ranagasamy RamanathanDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Los Angeles General Medical Center, Keck School of Medicine of USC (University of Southern California), Los Angeles, USA.
Manuel Sanchez LunaDepartment of Neonatology, University Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, ESP.
Saad AlsaediDepartment of Pediatrics and Neonatology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Jeddah, SAU.
Muzafar Gani Abdul WahabDepartment of Pediatrics and Neonatology, McMaster University, Hamilton, CAN.
Moataz HamdiDepartment of Pediatrics, Al Jalila Children's Speciality Hospital, Dubai, ARE.
Maysa SalehDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, Al Jalila Children's Speciality Hospital, Dubai, ARE.
University of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize the current evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of palivizumab as a prophylaxis for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) disease. We searched MEDLINE via PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, Web of Science, Embase, and Science Direct from inception till November 2023. Studies that assessed the efficacy and safety of palivizumab in infants aged between 28 days and three months of age were included. We analyzed the data using Review Manager 5.4 software, with results pooled across studies and expressed as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). A total of 10 studies were included. The effect estimates favored palivizumab over placebo regarding the hospitalization for RSV infection (RR=0.51, 95% CI: 0.40 to 0.65; P<0.00001) and ICU admission (RR=0.49, 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.81; P=0.005). On the other hand, the effect estimate showed no significant difference between palivizumab and placebo regarding all-cause mortality (RR=0.69, 95% CI: 0.42 to 1.15; P=0.16), lower respiratory tract infection (RR=0.42, 95% CI: 0.11 to 1.69; P=0.22), and need for mechanical ventilation (RR=0.75, 95% CI: 0.34 to 1.67; P=0.48). Palivizumab can be considered a prophylaxis for RSV disease in young children as it is safe, well-tolerated, and effective in reducing RSV hospitalizations. However, further research through high-quality randomized controlled trials is required to determine its efficacy as a therapeutic agent for established RSV infections.

Indexed as

chronic lung diseaselower respiratory tract infectionmonoclonal antibodiespalivizumabrespiratory syncytial virus (rsv)

Identifiers

PMID38292946
PMCPMC10825387
OpenAlexW4390468673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.