Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38292934›Full record

ArticleBone reports2024

Am I big boned? Bone length scaled reference data for HRpQCT measures of the radial and tibial diaphysis in White adults.

Stuart J Warden, Robyn K Fuchs, Ziyue Liu, Katelynn R Toloday, Rachel Surowiec, Sharon M Moe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. HR-pQCT measures of bone in autosomal dominant osteopetrosis highly correlate with fractures and inversely correlate with bone resorption markers.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stuart J WardenDepartment of Physical Therapy, School of Health and Human Sciences, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America.
Robyn K FuchsIndiana Center for Musculoskeletal Health, Indiana University, IN, United States of America.
Ziyue LiuIndiana Center for Musculoskeletal Health, Indiana University, IN, United States of America.
Katelynn R TolodayDepartment of Physical Therapy, School of Health and Human Sciences, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America.
Rachel SurowiecDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America.
Sharon M MoeIndiana Center for Musculoskeletal Health, Indiana University, IN, United States of America.

Funding

Quality Assurance and Quality Control Project Management: Improving Submissions and Study Conduct in the Human Subjects Research Prior Approval ProcessUL1TR002529 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI MOE, SHARON M, WIEHE, SARAH ELIZABETH · 2018 to 2022
$27.2M
Resource CoreP30AR072581 · NIAMS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI Sharon M Moe · 2017 to 2026
$8.3M
Indiana University Kidney Training Program (IU-KTP)T32DK120524 · NIDDK · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI MOE, SHARON M · 2019 to 2023
$1.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002529NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR072581NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK120524
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cross-sectional size of a long bone shaft influences its mechanical properties. We recently used high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HRpQCT) to create reference data for size measures of the radial and tibial diaphyses. However, data did not take into account the impact of bone length. Human bone exhibits relatively isometric allometry whereby cross-sectional area increases proportionally with bone length. The consequence is that taller than average individuals will generally have larger z-scores for bone size outcomes when length is not considered. The goal of the current work was to develop a means of determining whether an individual's cross-sectional bone size is suitable for their bone length. HRpQCT scans performed at 30 % of bone length proximal from the distal end of the radius and tibia were acquired from 1034 White females (age = 18.0 to 85.3 y) and 392 White males (age = 18.4 to 83.6 y). Positive relationships were confirmed between bone length and cross-sectional areas and estimated mechanical properties. Scaling factors were calculated and used to scale HRpQCT outcomes to bone length. Centile curves were generated for both raw and bone length scaled HRpQCT data using the LMS approach. Excel-based calculators are provided to facilitate calculation of z-scores for both raw and bone length scaled HRpQCT outcomes. The raw z-scores indicate the magnitude that an individual's HRpQCT outcomes differ relative to expected sex- and age-specific values, with the scaled z-scores also considering bone length. The latter enables it to be determined whether an individual or population of interest has normal sized bones for their length, which may have implications for injury risk. In addition to providing a means of expressing HRpQCT bone size outcomes relative to bone length, the current study also provides centile curves for outcomes previously without reference data, including tissue mineral density and moments of inertia.

Indexed as

Bone allometryBone strengthCortical boneNormative dataOsteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID38292934
PMCPMC10824696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.