Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38292926›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

Risk-benefit analysis of surgical treatment strategies for cystic craniopharyngioma in children and adolescents.

Michael Schmutzer-Sondergeld, Stefanie Quach, Sebastian Niedermeyer, Nico Teske, Moritz Ueberschaer, Christian Schichor, Mathias Kunz, Niklas Thon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Endoscopic endonasal versus open approach for craniopharyngioma treatment: a systematic review of clinical characteristics.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael Schmutzer-SondergeldDepartment of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Stefanie QuachDepartment of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Sebastian NiedermeyerDepartment of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Nico TeskeDepartment of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Moritz UeberschaerDepartment of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Christian SchichorDepartment of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Mathias Kunz *Department of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Niklas Thon *Department of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DELMU Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Treatment strategies for craniopharyngiomas are still under debate particularly for the young population. We here present tumor control and functional outcome data after surgical treatment focusing on stereotactic and microsurgical procedures for cystic craniopharyngiomas in children and adolescents. Methods: From our prospective institutional database, we identified all consecutive patients less than 18 years of age who were surgically treated for newly-diagnosed cystic craniopharyngioma between, 2000 and, 2022. Treatment decisions in favor of stereotactic treatment (STX) or microsurgery were made interdisciplinary. STX included aspiration and/or implantation of an internal shunt catheter for permanent cyst drainage. Microsurgery aimed for safe maximal tumor resections. Study endpoints were time to tumor recurrence (TTR) and functional outcome including ophthalmological/perimetric, endocrinological, and body-mass index (BMI) data. Results: 29 patients (median age 9.9 yrs, range 4-18 years) were analyzed. According to our interdisciplinary tumor board recommendation, 9 patients underwent stereotactic treatment, 10 patients microsurgical resection, and 10 patients the combination of both. Significant volume reduction was particularly achieved in the stereotactic (p=0.0019) and combined subgroups (p<0.001). Improvement of preoperative visual deficits was always achieved independent of the applied treatment modality. Microsurgery and the combinational treatment were associated with higher rates of postoperative endocrinological dysfunction (p<0.0001) including hypothalamic obesity (median BMI increase from 17.9kg/m Conclusion: In children and adolescents suffering from predominantly cystic craniopharyngiomas, stereotactic and microsurgical procedures can improve clinical symptoms at low procedural risk. Microsurgery, however, bears a higher risk of postoperative endocrine dysfunction. A risk-adapted surgical treatment concept may have to be applied repeatedly in order to achieve long-term tumor control even without additional irradiation.

Indexed as

craniopharyngiomacyst drainageendocrinological outcomemicrosurgerystereotaxyvisual outcome

Identifiers

PMID38292926
PMCPMC10825040
OpenAlexW4390917228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.