ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2024
Knowledge and Practice of Healthcare Professionals in the Medical Care of Asthma Adult Patients in Jordan with a Particular Reference to Adherence to GINA Recommendations.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Challenges in translating GINA asthma recommendations into practice: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals in Jordan.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Assessing the impact of GINA guideline-Concordant medication prescribing on asthma outcomes in a tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding asthma management among pharmacists in palestine: A cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of primary care general practitioners regarding COPD inhaler education: a cross-sectional study in Yiwu, China.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Article
- A current assessment of family physicians' knowledge and attitudes toward asthma management in primary care in Turkey according to the GINA strategy report.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2025Article
- Guideline-based asthma treatment in Asia: Insights from a robust time-in-state model.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2025Article
- Assessment of Medical Care Strategies for Primary Hypertension in Iraqi Adults: A Hospital-Based Problem-Oriented Plan.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Real-World Quality of Asthma Care According to the Spanish Consensus Protocol: The AsmaNET Project (ESR-20-20897).Journal of asthma and allergy · 2025Article
- A study on physicians' knowledge and practices of asthma management in Angola.Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine · 2024Article
- Impact of switching between different spirometric reference equations on the assessment of asthma severity and control among jordanian adults.Chronic respiratory diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate Jordanian healthcare professionals' knowledge, skills, and experience in dealing with and treating adult asthmatic patients and assess healthcare professionals' compliance with the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guideline recommendations for asthma treatment and management in Jordan. Patients and Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Jordan between May and June 2023. This study included physicians, pharmacists, and nurses working in clinical settings and directly interacting with asthma patients in Jordan's private and governmental healthcare facilities who were eligible to participate in this research. Three primary sections of an online survey were constructed using Google Forms and included demographic data, a diagnosis and management of the illness, and a list of worldwide medical references for asthma. Results: A total of 300 healthcare professionals, including pharmacists (103), nurses (87), Doctor of Pharmacy (28), and physicians (82), took part in this research. The survey respondents' general knowledge of the nature and symptoms of asthma is quite high, exceeding 84% and 86%, respectively. The survey also showed a high degree of awareness of asthma diagnosis. It was also revealed that around one-quarter of participants consistently reported the severity of asthma. The most frequent factor influencing the decision to take controller or maintenance medicines is symptom severity (reported from 86% of participants). The GINA guidelines were selected as the asthma information source by almost half of the participants. Finally, 47% of participants were aware of the GINA's 2019 adjustments of the recommendations. Conclusion: This study showed that Jordanian healthcare professionals understand the nature, symptoms, and diagnoses of asthma disease. However, many of the survey participants lack adherence, awareness, and understanding of the GINA recommendations about asthma management. More research is required to assess the adherence to the evidence-based recommendations and evaluate the impact of training courses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.