Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38292918›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in reproductive health

Barriers to fertility preservation access in transgender and gender diverse adolescents: a narrative review.

Ashni S Nadgauda, Samantha Butts

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in reproductive health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Non-Medical Gender Affirming Practices Among Transgender Individuals: A Systematic Review on the Health Implications of Chest Binding and Genital Tucking.International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ashni S NadgaudaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reading Hospital - Tower Health, 420 South 5th Avenue, Reading, PA 19611, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5538-3107
Samantha ButtsDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Penn State - Main Campus, Hershey, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fertility preservation (FP) involves the cryopreservation of gametes, embryos, and/or gonadal tissue oocytes, for future use in family building. FP as part of a comprehensive approach to care of transgender and gender diverse (TGD) individuals is an understudied topic. Current evidence indicates that gender affirming therapies may increase the risk for infertility. As a result, TGD individuals, including adolescents, should receive counseling regarding FP prior to beginning gender affirming treatment. Many barriers exist to TGD adolescents receiving FP counseling and undergoing FP if desired. The objective of this narrative review is to summarize the literature regarding the desire for FP in TGD adolescents, the barriers to TGD adolescents in accessing of FP, and to discuss potential interventions for alleviation of such barriers. A literature search using the following Medical Subject Headings search terms: 'transgender persons' and 'fertility preservation' and 'adolescents' was conducted

Indexed as

adolescentcryopreservationfertility preservationhealth care disparitiessocial determinants of healthtransgender persons

Identifiers

PMID38292918
PMCPMC10826369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.