Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38292904›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2024

Internet-based psychoeducation and support programme for relatives of young people with early psychosis: results of the first German-language intervention.

Mar Rus-Calafell, Tobias Teismann, Fine Kullmann, Dilara Alatas, Cristina Ballero-Reque, Julia Holewa, Marilena Rüsberg, Martin Brüne, Mercedes Paino, Silvia Schneider

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mar Rus-CalafellMental Health Research and Treatment Center, Faculty of Psychology, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Tobias TeismannMental Health Research and Treatment Center, Faculty of Psychology, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Fine KullmannMental Health Research and Treatment Center, Faculty of Psychology, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Dilara AlatasMental Health Research and Treatment Center, Faculty of Psychology, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Cristina Ballero-RequeMental Health Research and Treatment Center, Faculty of Psychology, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Julia HolewaMental Health Research and Treatment Center, Faculty of Psychology, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Marilena RüsbergMental Health Research and Treatment Center, Faculty of Psychology, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Martin BrüneLWL University Hospital Bochum, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Preventive Medicine, Division of Social Neuropsychiatry and Evolutionary Medicine, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Mercedes PainoDepartment of Psychology, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.
Silvia SchneiderMental Health Research and Treatment Center, Faculty of Psychology, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Ruhr University Bochum · DEUniversidad de Oviedo · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: International clinical guidelines recommend Family Interventions (FIs) especially for families of people at early stages of psychosis. The German S3 treatment guideline for schizophrenia gives FIs the highest level of clinical recommendation. However, some family relatives have limited access to these services due to health system constrains. Digital interventions have emerged as a solution to overcome this hindered access to evidence-based family interventions. Objective: The present pilot study evaluates the feasibility and potential efficacy of the first German moderated online psychoeducation and support programme (ePSP) for relatives of people with early psychosis, with the additional purpose to improve accessibility and reduce waiting times. Methods: A pre-post study was performed. A brief recruitment period was pre-established (10 weeks) to test potential improvement of regular therapy waiting times in Germany. A total of 25 relatives of people with early psychosis were recruited and received the 12-week moderated online intervention. Assessments were conducted at baseline and at post intervention. Acceptance of the intervention and the user's experience were also evaluated at post intervention. Results: Recruitment, retention rates and qualitative data support the feasibility and acceptability of the ePSP. Significant positive effects of the interventions were found on key therapeutic targets, including both primary outcomes (i.e., perceived stress and beliefs about the illness). Twenty-one participants also completed the open-ended questions of the user experience questionnaire, which yielded three main themes: most important modules, difficulties in using the programme and ways to improve ePSP. Discussion: These results provide preliminary efficacy estimates for a fully powered RCT to investigate superiority (or equipoise) effects of the ePSP in comparison to the routine face-to-face family therapy groups. This future RCT will also allow further exploration of ePSP to improve access to psychological therapy for relatives of young people with psychosis, also in relation to the new ground-breaking Digital Healthcare Act in Germany.

Indexed as

digitalisationdigital mental healthearly psychosisfamily interventionpsychotherapy access

Identifiers

PMID38292904
PMCPMC10824940
OpenAlexW4390917201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.