Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38292886›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2024

Improved Dosimetry and Plan Quality for Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Using Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy: A Single Institutional Study.

Joel A Pogue, Carlos E Cardenas, Dennis N Stanley, Courtney Stanley, Whitney Hotsinpiller, Christopher Veale, Michael H Soike, Richard A Popple, Drexell H Boggs, Joseph Harms

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joel A PogueDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Carlos E CardenasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Dennis N StanleyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Courtney StanleyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Whitney HotsinpillerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Christopher VealeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Michael H SoikeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Richard A PoppleDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Drexell H BoggsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Joseph HarmsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

CTSA K12 Program at the University of Alabama at BirminghamK12TR004769 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Renee A. Heffron, Lucio Miele · 2024 to 2026
$4.8M
NCATS NIH HHS K12 TR004769NCI NIH HHS L30 CA284339
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is an attractive treatment modality for eligible patients as it has been shown to result in similar local control and improved cosmetic outcomes compared with whole breast radiation therapy. The use of online adaptive radiation therapy (OART) for APBI is promising as it allows for a reduction of planning target volume margins because breast motion and lumpectomy cavity volume changes are accounted for in daily imaging. Here we present a retrospective, single-institution evaluation on the adequacy of kV-cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) OART for APBI treatments. Methods and Materials: Nineteen patients (21 treatment sites) were treated to 30 Gy in 5 fractions between January of 2022 and May of 2023. Time between simulation and treatment, change in gross tumor (ie, lumpectomy cavity) volume, and differences in dose volume histogram metrics with adaption were analyzed. The Wilcoxon paired, nonparametric test was used to test for dose volume histogram metric differences between the scheduled plans (initial plans recalculated on daily CBCT anatomy) and delivered plans, either the scheduled or adapted plan, which was reoptimized using daily anatomy. Results: Median (interquartile range) time from simulation to first treatment was 26 days (21-32 days). During this same time, median gross tumor volume reduction was 16.0% (7.3%-23.9%) relative to simulation volume. Adaptive treatments took 31.3 minutes (27.4-36.6 minutes) from start of CBCT to treatment session end. At treatment, the adaptive plan was selected for 86% (89/103) of evaluable fractions. In evaluating plan quality, 78% of delivered plans met all target, organs at risk, and conformity metrics evaluated, compared with 34% of scheduled plans. Conclusions: Use of OART for stereotactic linac-based APBI allowed for safe, high-quality treatments in this cohort of 21 treatment courses. Although treatment delivery times were longer than traditional stereotactic body treatments, there were notable improvements in plan quality for APBI using OART.

Identifiers

PMID38292886
PMCPMC10823088
OpenAlexW4389285320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.