ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics
Effect of a novel quaternary ammonium silane based cavity cleanser FiteBac 2% K21 QAS in comparison with other cavity disinfectants on the bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Shear bond strength evaluation of bioactive restorative materials on pretreated carious dentin-influence on silver diamine fluoride, potassium iodide, and glutathione.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The application of cavity cleansers for cavity disinfection can be a crucial step in the longevity of restorations. The objective of the present study was to compare the effect of the application of a new quaternary ammonium silane (QAS)-based cavity cleanser (2% K21 QAS), with other commercially available cavity disinfectants on the bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC). Materials and Methods: The buccal surfaces of 40 extracted premolars were trimmed to obtain a flat dentinal surface and were randomly divided into four experimental groups depending on the cavity cleansers used before restoration. Group 1: 2% chlorhexidine (CHX), Group 2: QAS (FiteBac 2% K21 QAS), Group 3: silver diamine fluoride-potassium iodide (Riva Star, SDF-KI), and Group 4: 3% hydrogen peroxide (H Results: Among the experimental groups, SDF-KI has shown the highest mean SBS, followed by 2% K21 QAS, and 2% CHX, which have shown almost comparable results. The 3% H Conclusion: According to the results of the present study, 2% K21 QAS has the potential to be used as an effective cavity cleanser before the placement of RMGIC restorations. Since its application does not affect the bond strength of restoration, it can be successfully used as an alternative to CHX and SDF-KI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.