Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38292719›Full record

ArticleOpen veterinary journal2023

Banthita Saengsitthisak, Wasana Chaisri, Raktham Mektrirat, Terdsak Yano, And Surachai Pikulkaew

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Open veterinary journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Banthita SaengsitthisakFaculty of Pharmacy, Payap University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Wasana ChaisriDepartment of Food Animal Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Raktham MektriratDepartment of Veterinary Biosciences and Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Terdsak YanoDepartment of Food Animal Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
And Surachai PikulkaewDepartment of Food Animal Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Chiang Mai University · THPayap University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Aim: The purpose of this study is to determine what types of phytochemicals are present in the essential oil extracted from turmeric rhizome ( Methods: The chemical composition and quantity of the major substances in essential oils from fresh turmeric rhizome were detected by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The antiparasitic effect of turmeric oils on Results: By using GC-MS analysis, it was possible to identify the primary phytochemical component of turmeric essential oil as b-turmerone. The results obtained from the Conclusion: In summary, the efficacy of turmeric essential oil against fish louse has been shown both

Indexed as

ArguloidaOils, VolatileAnimalsCurcumaGoldfishTrichlorfonOils, VolatileTrichlorfonantiparasiticArgulus spp. goldfishCarassius auratusCurcuma longa L.Turmeric

Identifiers

PMID38292719
PMCPMC10824080
OpenAlexW4390557375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.