ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2024
PgxSAVy: A tool for comprehensive evaluation of variant peptide quality in proteogenomics - catching the (un)usual suspects.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Variant peptides resulting from single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) can lead to aberrant protein functions and have translational potential for disease diagnosis and personalized therapy. Variant peptides detected by proteogenomics are fraught with high number of false positives, but there is no uniform and comprehensive approach to assess variant quality across analysis pipelines. Despite class-specific FDR along with ad-hoc filters, the problem is far from solved. These protocols are typically manual and tedious, and thus not uniform across labs. We demonstrate that variant peptide rescoring, integrated with intensity, variant event information and search result features, allows better discrimination of correct variant peptides. Implemented into PgxSAVy - a tool for quality control of variant peptides, this method can tackle the high rate of false positives. PgxSAVy provides a rigorous framework for quality control and annotations of variant peptides on the basis of (i) variant quality, (ii) isobaric masses, and (iii) disease annotation. PgxSAVy demonstrated high accuracy by identifying true variants with 98.43% accuracy on simulated data. Large-scale proteogenomic reanalysis of ∼2.8 million spectra (PXD004010 and PXD001468) resulted in 12,705 variant peptide spectrum matches (PSMs), of which PgxSAVy evaluated 3028 (23.8%), 1409 (11.1%) and 8268 (65.1%) as confident, semi-confident and doubtful respectively. PgxSAVy also annotates the variants based on their pathogenicity and provides support for assisted manual validation. The analysis of proteins carrying variants can provide fine granularity in discovering important pathways. PgxSAVy will advance personalized medicine by providing a comprehensive framework for quality control and prioritization of proteogenomics variants. PgxSAVy is freely available at https://pgxsavy.igib.res.in/ as a webserver and https://github.com/anuragraj/PgxSAVy as a stand-alone tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.