Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38292468›Full record

ReviewResuscitation plus2024

Wolf creek XVII part 4: Amplifying lay-rescuer response.

Katie N Dainty, Yih Yng Ng, Pin Pin Pek, Rudolph W Koster, Marcus Eng Hock Ong

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Resuscitation plus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Katie N DaintyPatient-Centered Outcomes, North York General Hospital Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Canada.
Yih Yng NgDigital and Smart Health Office, Ng Teng Fong Centre for Healthcare Innovation Department of Preventive and Population Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Pin Pin PekPrehospital and Emergency Research Centre, Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School Department of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Rudolph W KosterDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, The Netherlands.
Marcus Eng Hock OngDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLNanyang Technological University · SGNational University of Singapore · SGNorth York General Hospital · CASingapore General Hospital · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Amplifying lay-rescuer response is a key priority to increase survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). We describe the current state of lay-rescuer response, how we envision the future, and the gaps, barriers, and research priorities that will amplify response to OHCA. Methods: 'Amplifying Lay-Rescuer Response' was one of six focus topics for the Wolf Creek XVII Conference held on June 14-17, 2023, in Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. Conference invitees included international thought leaders and scientists in the field of cardiac arrest resuscitation from academia and industry. Participants submitted via online survey knowledge gaps, barriers to translation and research priorities for each focus topic. Expert panels used the survey results and their own perspectives and insights to create and present a preliminary unranked list for each category that was debated, revised and ranked by all attendees to identify the top 5 for each category. Results: The top five knowledge gaps as ranked by the panel, reflected a recognition of the need to better understand the psycho-social aspects of lay response. The top five barriers to translation reflected issues at the individual, community, societal, structural, and governmental levels. The top five research priorities were focused on understanding the social/psychological and emotional barriers to action, finding the most effective/cost-effective strategies to educate lay persons and implement community life-saving interventions, evaluation of new technological solutions and how to enhance the role of dispatch working with lay-rescuers. Conclusion: Future research in lay rescuer response should incorporate technology innovations, understand the "humanity" of the situation, leverage implementation science and systems thinking to save lives. This will require the field of resuscitation to engage with scholars outside our traditional ranks and to be open to new ways of thinking about old problems.

Indexed as

lay rescuerlay responsesudden cardiac arrest

Identifiers

PMID38292468
PMCPMC10827540
OpenAlexW4390820025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.