Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38292414›Full record

ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2024

A Comparative Study Evaluating the Quality of Life and Survival Outcomes in Patients Receiving Chemotherapy Versus Oral Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor in the Third Line and Beyond Setting for Advanced NSCLC.

Vanita Noronha, Nandini S Menon, Vijay Maruti Patil, M V Chandrakanth, Sucheta More, Aditya Dhanawat, Oindrila Roy Chowdhary, Ajaykumar Chandrabhan Singh, Supriya Goud, Srushti Shah and 15 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Vanita NoronhaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Nandini S MenonDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Vijay Maruti PatilDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
M V ChandrakanthDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Sucheta MoreDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Aditya DhanawatDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Oindrila Roy ChowdharyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Ajaykumar Chandrabhan SinghDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Supriya GoudDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Srushti ShahDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Naveen KaruvandanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Kunal Naishadh JobanputraDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Darshit Kalpeshkumar ShahDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Minit Jalan ShahDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Rupjyoti SarmaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Dhwaniben PatelDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Ritam JoarderDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Prashant KumarDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Anupa JohnDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Jaspreet KaurDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Saurabh BagraDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Nilendu PurandareDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Amit JanuDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Abhishek MahajanDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Kumar PrabhashDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Homi Bhabha National Institute · INAmgen (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The outcomes in advanced NSCLC have improved owing to the availability of more effective systemic and improved supportive care. This has increased the number of patients who seek treatment in the third line and beyond setting. We conducted this study to compare the quality of life (QoL), toxicity, and outcomes in patients receiving chemotherapy and EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in this setting. Methods: In this phase 3, randomized, open-label study, patients with stage III or IV NSCLC with disease progression on at least two prior lines of chemotherapy, with a life expectancy of at least 3 months, without prior EGFR TKI exposure, and stable brain metastases (if any) were included. Patients were randomized to receive chemotherapy (gemcitabine or docetaxel or paclitaxel or vinorelbine) or an EGFR TKI (erlotinib or gefitinib). The primary end point was the change in QoL at 8 to 10 weeks; the secondary outcomes were safety and overall survival (OS). Patients underwent clinical evaluation at every visit, and toxicity was assessed as per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03. A radiological tumor response assessment was done every 8 to 12 weeks from the start of therapy. The QoL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ C30 and LC13 questionnaires. The change in QoL scores was calculated as the difference between scores at baseline and scores at 8 to 10 weeks (Δ) for each QoL domain. The Mann-Whitney Results: A total of 246 patients were enrolled in the study, with 123 in each arm. There was a male predominance with 69.1% male patients in the chemotherapy arm and 70.7% in the EGFR TKI arm. The median age of patients in the chemotherapy arm was 54 years and 55 years in the chemotherapy and EGFR TKI arms, respectively. There was no significant difference in the change in QoL at baseline and the second visit (Δ) in both arms in all domains of EORTC QLQ C30 except cognitive function ( Conclusions: There was no significant difference in most QoL scales (except cognitive function and alopecia), OS, and PFS of patients with advanced NSCLC receiving an EGFR TKI as compared with chemotherapy TKI in the third-line setting. The toxicity profile is consistent with the known toxicities of the agents.

Indexed as

ChemotherapyEGFR TKINon–small cell lung cancerThird line

Identifiers

PMID38292414
PMCPMC10827558
OpenAlexW4389903485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.