Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38292402›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of critical illness and injury science

Clinical utility of i-gel

Manish Kumar Tripathi, Tanmay Tiwari, Bhavya Naithani, Divya Narain Upadhyaya, Prem Raj Singh, Ila Tripathi

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of critical illness and injury science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Manish Kumar TripathiDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Tanmay TiwariDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Bhavya NaithaniDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Divya Narain UpadhyayaDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Prem Raj SinghDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Ila TripathiDepartment of Ophthalmic Surgery, Sarojini Naidu Medical College, Agra, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Post burn injury contracture (PBC) neck patients pose a unique challenge for the anesthesiologists. The use of supraglottic device (SGDs) for managing such patients is being increasingly used. We compared i-gel Methods: The study included 63 subjects with mild/moderate PBC neck of either sex with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status I and II under GA. Patients with intraoral pathology, mouth opening <2.5 cm, and severe contracture were excluded. Patients were randomly assigned to i-gel Results: Mean insertion time was significantly less in Group I as compared to Group B (17.35 ± 1.43 vs. 21.32 ± 1.10 s; Conclusion: SGDs are attractive option for airway management in mild/moderate degree of PBC neck. i-gel

Indexed as

Airway managementanesthesia generalburnscontractureinjurylaryngeal masks

Identifiers

PMID38292402
PMCPMC10824207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.