ArticleFrontiers in public health2023
Status and associated factors of food and nutrition literacy among young adults aged 15-44 years in Shenzhen City, China.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Joint associations between maternal exposure to ambient air pollutants during pregnancy and low Apgar score in newborns: a birth cohort study in China.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Experiential learning for nutrition literacy of school-aged children: a study protocol of cluster randomized controlled trial.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Nutrition literacy and socio-demographic determinants among Chinese women of childbearing age.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Psychometric validation of the Turkish version of the short nutrition literacy scale and its association with intuitive eating and body appreciation in young adults.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- The Impact of Chinese Adult's Food Literacy on Healthy Eating Intentions Based on the Planned Behaviour Theory.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Nutrition Literacy and Dietary Behavior Among Malaysian Adults.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- Prevalence of nutritional literacy and associated factors among adult residents: a cross-sectional study from marginalized Community in Islamabad, Pakistan.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Gender, residence, and socioeconomic differences in the relationship of nutrition literacy with vegetable and fruit intake in adults.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Assessment of the General Nutrition Knowledge of Students from the University of Novi Sad (Vojvodina, Serbia).Nutrients · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Food and nutrition literacy (FNL) plays an important role in young adults' dietary habits and nutrition. This study aimed to investigate FNL status and its associated factors among young adults aged 15-44 years in Shenzhen. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 5,390 participants was conducted in June 2021. FNL was measured using the Food and Nutrition Literacy Questionnaire for Chinese Adults (FNLQ). A generalized linear model was employed to analyze the factors associated with FNL. Results: The median FNL score (total score = 100) was 68.00, which was below the adequate level of 80. FNL was divided into the two different domains of knowledge and skills, with significantly different scoring rate of 85.30 and 67.77%, respectively. The overall proportion of respondents with adequate FNL was 19.52%. The FNL score was significantly higher among the participants who were female ( Conclusion: Generally, the level of FNL among young adults in Shenzhen, China, was relatively low. Thus, nutrition education programs targeted at promoting improved FNL status call for additional emphasis, especially in subgroups with lower scores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.