ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics
Flow characteristics of positive and negative pressure irrigation in an immature tooth - A computational fluid dynamics study.
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Influence of conventional and energy-intensive irrigation methods on apical pressure created in minimally instrumented molar canals: an ex vivo study.Odontology · 2026Article
- Efficacy of different irrigation needles used in endodontics: anBiomaterial investigations in dentistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This study aims to investigate the irrigation dynamics in an immature tooth during positive and negative pressure irrigation using a computational fluid dynamics (CFDs) model. Materials and Methods: Cone-beam computed tomography scan of the maxillary central incisor with Cvek's stage III root development was used for the reconstruction of the root canal geometry. The computer-aided design models of open (front vent and notched) and closed (side vent [SV]) needles were positioned inside the root canal at two penetration depths, i.e., 3 mm and 1 mm short of apex. The negative pressure microcannula (MiC) was positioned at the level of the root apex. A prevalidated CFD model was used to simulate endodontic irrigation. Results: The irrigant velocity in the apical root canal beyond the needle tip exceeded 0.1 m/s. As the needles were positioned closer to the apex, the wall shear stress (WSS) increased for the open-ended needles and decreased for the SV needle. MiC produced the lowest WSS. The mean apical pressure produced by the SV needle and MiC were below the critical threshold for periapical extrusion. Conclusions: The SV needle inserted within 1-3 mm of root apex during endodontic irrigation in an immature tooth allows adequate irrigant exchange with minimal risk of periapical extrusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.