Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38292296›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences2023

Synthesized Image Reconstruction for Post-Reconstruction Resolution Recovery.

Laurence Vass, Andrew J Reader

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. AI for PET image reconstruction.The British journal of radiology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Laurence VassSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging SciencesKing's College London WC2R 2LS London U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2846-4101
Andrew J ReaderSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging SciencesKing's College London WC2R 2LS London U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2726-3383

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resolution recovery (RR) techniques in positron emission tomography (PET) imaging aim to mitigate spatial resolution losses and related inaccuracies in quantification by using a model of the system's point spread function (PSF) during reconstruction or post-processing. However, including PSF modeling in fully 3-D image reconstruction is far from trivial as access to the scanner-specific forward and back-projectors is required, along with access to the 3-D sinogram data. Hence, post-reconstruction RR methods, such as the Richardson-Lucy (RL) algorithm, can be more practical. However, the RL method leads to relatively rapid noise amplification in early image iterations, giving inferior image quality compared to iterates obtained by placing the PSF model in the reconstruction algorithm. We propose a post-reconstruction RR method by synthesizing PET data by a forward projection of an initial real data reconstruction (such reconstructions are usually available via a scanner's standard reconstruction software). The synthetic PET data are then used to reconstruct an image, but crucially now including a modeled PSF within the system model used during reconstruction. Results from simulations and real data demonstrate the proposed method improves image quality compared to the RL algorithm, whilst avoiding the need for scanner-specific projectors and raw sinogram data (as required by standard PSF modeling within reconstruction).

Indexed as

Image reconstructionpositron emission tomography (PET)resolution recovery (RR)

Identifiers

PMID38292296
PMCPMC10824400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.