Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38292268›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2024

MolToxPred: small molecule toxicity prediction using machine learning approach.

Anjali Setiya, Vinod Jani, Uddhavesh Sonavane, Rajendra Joshi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
13.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. AI/ML-based computational models for toxicity prediction.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anjali SetiyaHPC-Medical & Bioinformatics Applications Group, Centre for Development of Advanced Computing (C-DAC) Innovation Park, Panchawati, Pashan Pune 411008 India rajendra@cdac.in.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2932-8615
Vinod JaniHPC-Medical & Bioinformatics Applications Group, Centre for Development of Advanced Computing (C-DAC) Innovation Park, Panchawati, Pashan Pune 411008 India rajendra@cdac.in.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3049-0891
Uddhavesh SonavaneHPC-Medical & Bioinformatics Applications Group, Centre for Development of Advanced Computing (C-DAC) Innovation Park, Panchawati, Pashan Pune 411008 India rajendra@cdac.in.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2482-9126
Rajendra JoshiHPC-Medical & Bioinformatics Applications Group, Centre for Development of Advanced Computing (C-DAC) Innovation Park, Panchawati, Pashan Pune 411008 India rajendra@cdac.in.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1299-0091
Centre for Development of Advanced Computing · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Different types of chemicals and products may exhibit various health risks when administered into the human body. For toxicity reasons, the number of new drugs entering the market through the conventional drug development process has been reduced over the years. However, with the advent of big data and artificial intelligence, machine learning techniques have emerged as a potential solution for predicting toxicity and ensuring efficient drug development and chemical safety. An ML model for toxicity prediction can reduce experimental costs and time while addressing ethical concerns by drastically reducing the need for animals and clinical trials. Herein, MolToxPred, an ML-based tool, has been developed using a stacked model approach to predict the potential toxicity of small molecules and metabolites. The stacked model consists of random forest, multi-layer perceptron, and LightGBM as base classifiers and Logistic Regression as the meta classifier. For training and validation purposes, a comprehensive set of toxic and non-toxic molecules is curated. Different structural and physicochemical-based features in the form of molecular descriptors and fingerprints were employed. MolToxPred utilizes a comprehensive feature selection process and optimizes its hyperparameters through Bayesian optimization with stratified 5-fold cross-validation. In the evaluation phase, MolToxPred achieved an AUROC of 87.76% on the test set and 88.84% on an external validation set. The McNemar test was used as the post-hoc test to determine if the stacked models' performance was significantly different compared to the base learners. The developed stacked model outperformed its base classifiers and an existing tool in the literature, reaffirming its better performance. The hypothesis is that the incorporation of a diverse set of data, the subsequent feature selection, and a stacked ensemble approach give MolToxPred the edge over other methods. In addition to this, an attempt has been made to identify structural alerts responsible for endpoints of the Tox21 data to determine the association of a molecule with a plausible downstream pathway of action. MolToxPred may be helpful for drug discovery and regulatory pipelines in pharmaceutical and other industries for

Identifiers

PMID38292268
PMCPMC10826801
OpenAlexW4391346967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.