Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38292259›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2024

Integration of network pharmacology, molecular docking, and simulations to evaluate phytochemicals from

Kunal Bhattacharya, Bhargab Chandra Nath, Ekbal Ahmed, Pukar Khanal, Nongmaithem Randhoni Chanu, Satyendra Deka, Dibyajyoti Das, Amit Kumar Shrivastava

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Cyclomulberrin fromRSC advances · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kunal BhattacharyaPratiksha Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences Guwahati Assam 781026 India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5546-1504
Bhargab Chandra NathPratiksha Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences Guwahati Assam 781026 India.
Ekbal AhmedPratiksha Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences Guwahati Assam 781026 India.
Pukar KhanalDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, KLE College of Pharmacy, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research (KAHER) Belagavi 590010 India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8187-2120
Nongmaithem Randhoni ChanuPratiksha Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences Guwahati Assam 781026 India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1999-7803
Satyendra DekaPratiksha Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences Guwahati Assam 781026 India.
Dibyajyoti DasPratiksha Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences Guwahati Assam 781026 India.
Amit Kumar ShrivastavaDepartment of Pharmacology, Universal College of Medical Sciences, and Teaching Hospital Bhairahawa, Rupandehi 32900 Nepal sr.akshri.ucms.np@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8915-9186
National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research · INCollege of Medical Sciences · NPKLE University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID38292259
PMCPMC10825855
OpenAlexW4391375949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.