Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38292216›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2024

Racial and ethnic diversity in global neuroscience clinical trials.

Loes Rutten-Jacobs, Tammy McIver, Adriana Reyes, Marta Pereira, Rachel Rosenthal, Christine T Parusel, Kathryn R Wagner, Rachelle Doody

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Loes Rutten-JacobsProduct Development Neuroscience, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Tammy McIverProduct Development Data Sciences, Roche Products Ltd, Welwyn Garden City, UK.
Adriana ReyesProduct Development Data Sciences, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Marta PereiraPharma International, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Amadora, Portugal.
Rachel RosenthalProduct Development Data Sciences, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Christine T ParuselProduct Development Neuroscience, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Kathryn R WagnerProduct Development Neuroscience, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Rachelle DoodyProduct Development Neuroscience, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite efforts to increase diversity in neuroscience trials, racial and ethnic minority groups remain underrepresented. Disparities in clinical trial participation could reflect unequal opportunities to participate and may contribute to decreased generalizability of findings and failure to identify important differences in efficacy and safety outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the F. Hoffmann-La Roche database for global, multicenter, neuroscience clinical trials from February 2016 to February 2021 and summarized and stratified race and ethnicity distributions by clinical trial therapeutic area and by country. These data were then compared to national population data for each study's targeted age group (available for studies conducted in the US, Canada, and the UK). The underrepresentation or overrepresentation of each racial and ethnic group was summarized. Results: The analysis population included 8015 participants from 47 countries. Globally, 85.6 % of participants were White, 7.1 % were Asian, 1.6 % were Black, 1.3 % were American Indian or Alaska Native, less than 0.1 % were Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, 0.7 % were of multiple races, and 3.6 % were of other/unknown race. White individuals predominated in all but one trial. Black individuals were underrepresented in all trials but one. Asian individuals were overrepresented in approximately 20 % of trials. In the US, 7.3 % of participants were of Hispanic or Latino ethnicity vs 16.4 % of the US population. Conclusion: The findings and learnings from this summary and analysis demonstrate the need for continued awareness and new approaches in designing studies that reflect population diversity.

Indexed as

Clinical trialsCNSDiversityInclusionRaceTrial design

Identifiers

PMID38292216
PMCPMC10824686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.