Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38292165›Full record

ArticleiScience2024

Prediction error drives associative learning and conditioned behavior in a spiking model of Drosophila larva.

Anna-Maria Jürgensen, Panagiotis Sakagiannis, Michael Schleyer, Bertram Gerber, Martin Paul Nawrot

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The exploration of consciousness in insects.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Cognitive limits of larvalLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna-Maria JürgensenComputational Systems Neuroscience, Institute of Zoology, University of Cologne, 50674 Cologne, Germany.
Panagiotis SakagiannisComputational Systems Neuroscience, Institute of Zoology, University of Cologne, 50674 Cologne, Germany.
Michael SchleyerLeibniz Institute for Neurobiology (LIN), Department of Genetics, 39118 Magdeburg, Germany.
Bertram GerberLeibniz Institute for Neurobiology (LIN), Department of Genetics, 39118 Magdeburg, Germany.
Martin Paul NawrotComputational Systems Neuroscience, Institute of Zoology, University of Cologne, 50674 Cologne, Germany.
University of Cologne · DECenter for Behavioral Brain Sciences · DEHokkaido University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting reinforcement from sensory cues is beneficial for goal-directed behavior. In insect brains, underlying associations between cues and reinforcement, encoded by dopaminergic neurons, are formed in the mushroom body. We propose a spiking model of the

Indexed as

BioinformaticsBiological sciencesNatural sciencesNeuroscienceTechniques in neuroscience

Identifiers

PMID38292165
PMCPMC10824792
OpenAlexW4390238754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.