Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38292078›Full record

ArticlePEC innovation2024

Patient's informational needs and outreach preferences: A cross-sectional survey study in patients with hepatobiliary malignancies.

Sean M Stokes, Mintallah Haider, Susan T Vadaparampil, Catherine Levitt, Olivia Hardy, Richard Kim, Diana L Castillo, Jason Denbo, Jason B Fleming, Daniel A Anaya

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PEC innovation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 65% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sean M StokesDepartment of GI Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, United States.
Mintallah HaiderDepartment of GI Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, United States.
Susan T VadaparampilOffice of Community Outreach Engagement & Equity, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, United States.
Catherine LevittMorsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, 560 Channelside Drive, Tampa, FL 33602, United States.
Olivia HardyMorsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, 560 Channelside Drive, Tampa, FL 33602, United States.
Richard KimDepartment of GI Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, United States.
Diana L CastilloDepartment of GI Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, United States.
Jason DenboDepartment of GI Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, United States.
Jason B FlemingDepartment of GI Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, United States.
Daniel A AnayaDepartment of GI Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, United States.
University of South Florida · USMoffitt Cancer Center · US

Funding

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHP30CA076292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI KENNETH Lynn WRIGHT · 1998 to 2026
$93.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA076292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Hepatobiliary tumors have evolving management guidelines. Patient educational needs and interest in community engagement are unknown. This study serves as a needs assessment. Methods: A prospective, needs assessment, survey study of hepatobiliary patients was performed (2016-2019). Surveys ( Results: Seventy patients completed the survey (response rate = 41.4%). Most patients had completed surgical treatment (84.3%). C Conclusion: Multidisciplinary care is complex and difficult for patients to navigate. Most patients have interest in educational resources and prefer online modalities. Patients understand multidisciplinary tumor boards, but communication could be improved. Innovation: These data inform a new, innovative, approach to outreach efforts in this population.

Identifiers

PMID38292078
PMCPMC10825679
OpenAlexW4389990435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.