ArticleAPL bioengineering2024
Improvement of clinical wound microcirculation diagnosis using an object tracking-based laser speckle contrast imaging system.
Article in APL bioengineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rapid noncontact laser speckle imaging for perfusion-based differentiation of wound necrosis.iScience · 2026Article
- Comprehensive validation of a compact laser speckle contrast imaging system for vascular function assessment: from the laboratory to the clinic.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wound monitoring is crucial for effective healing, as nonhealing wounds can lead to tissue ulceration and necrosis. Evaluating wound recovery involves observing changes in angiogenesis. Laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) is vital for wound assessment due to its rapid imaging, high resolution, wide coverage, and noncontact properties. When using LSCI equipment, regions of interest (ROIs) must be delineated in lesion areas in images for quantitative analysis. However, patients with serious wounds cannot maintain constant postures because the affected areas are often associated with discomfort and pain. This leads to deviations between the drawn ROI and actual wound position when using LSCI for wound assessment, affecting the reliability of relevant assessments. To address these issues, we used the channel and spatial reliability tracker object tracking algorithm to develop an automatic ROI tracking function for LSCI systems. This algorithm is used to track and correct artificial movements in blood flow images, address the ROI position offset caused by the movement of the affected body part, increase the blood flow analysis accuracy, and improve the clinical applicability of LSCI systems. ROI tracking experiments were performed by simulating wounds, and the results showed that the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) ranged from 0.134 to 0.976. Furthermore, the object within the ROI affected tracking performance. Clinical assessments across wound types showed ICCs ranging from 0.798 to 0.917 for acute wounds and 0.628-0.849 for chronic wounds. We also discuss factors affecting tracking performance and propose strategies to enhance implementation effectiveness.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.