ArticleThe Journal of dermatology2024
Regional differences in the prevalence of generalized pustular psoriasis in Japan.
Article in The Journal of dermatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Asia-Pacific consensus recommendations on the management of generalized pustular psoriasis.The Journal of dermatology · 2024Guideline
- An Exploratory Study to Identify Factors Associated with Recurrence of Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Flares in Adult Patients in Japan.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2026Article
- Safety and effectiveness of secukinumab in Japanese patients with generalized pustular psoriasis: A post-marketing surveillance.The Journal of dermatology · 2025Observational
- Regional differences in the prevalence of generalized pustular psoriasis in Japan.The Journal of dermatology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP), a rare form of psoriasis, is characterized by neutrophil-rich, sterile pustules. In Japan, GPP has intractable and rare disease designation, which allows patients to access support from national and local governments for medical expenses. Previously, similar numbers of patients in Tokyo and Hokkaido have been shown to have GPP designation, despite different population sizes. Here, we determine whether there are regional differences in the proportion of patients receiving GPP designation status in Japan and aim to identify causal factors. In this descriptive, retrospective cohort study, publicly available data were collected on the number of patients with intractable and rare disease designation for GPP in each prefecture and age classification (April 2018-March 2021). Three other designated intractable and rare disease cohorts were included: pemphigus, rare skin diseases, and all diseases. The primary outcome was the standardized morbidity ratio (SMR) of patients at prefecture level (observed numbers divided by expected). Regional differences were compared with the statistical expectation for the total population and age distribution of each prefecture. Regional differences were observed in all cohorts. Overall, 1910 patients had GPP as a designated intractable and rare disease in 2020. Regional differences in SMRs for GPP were observed with high SMRs (≥1.5) in Hokkaido, Tottori, Kagawa, and Miyazaki, and low SMRs (<0.6) in Gunma and Kanagawa. Regional differences in SMRs for GPP did not correlate with the number of medical doctors or dermatologists or internal migration. The number of medical doctors or dermatologists correlated with SMRs in the rare skin diseases and total cohorts. Regional differences in Japan exist in the number of patients with GPP who have an intractable and rare disease designation. Managing rare diseases is an important public health issue, and further research is required to elucidate the factors contributing to these differences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.