ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2024
Inhibitory tagging both speeds and strengthens saccade target selection in the superior colliculus during visual search.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Spatial evolution in temporal dynamics of hemodynamic response function in human superior colliculi with ultra-high-resolution MRI at 9.4T.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It has been suggested that, during difficult visual search tasks involving time pressure and multiple saccades, inhibitory tagging helps to facilitate efficient saccade target selection by reducing responses to objects in the scene once they have been searched and rejected. The superior colliculus (SC) is a midbrain structure involved in target selection, and recent findings suggest an influence of inhibitory tagging on SC activity. Precisely how, and by how much, inhibitory tagging influences target selection by SC neurons, however, is unclear. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to characterize and quantify the influence of inhibitory tagging on target selection in the SC. Rhesus monkeys performed a visual search task involving time pressure and multiple saccades. Early in the fixation period between saccades in the context of this task, a subset of SC neurons reliably discriminated the stimulus selected as the next saccade goal, consistent with a role in target selection. Discrimination occurred earlier and was more robust, however, when unselected stimuli in the search array had been previously fixated on the same trial. This indicates that inhibitory tagging both speeds and strengthens saccade target selection in the SC during multisaccade search. The results provide constraints on models of target selection based on SC activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.