Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38292000›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2024

Inhibitory tagging both speeds and strengthens saccade target selection in the superior colliculus during visual search.

Christopher Conroy, Rakesh Nanjappa, Robert M McPeek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christopher ConroyDepartment of Biological and Vision Sciences, State University of New York College of Optometry, New York City, New York, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9332-2097
Rakesh NanjappaDepartment of Biological and Vision Sciences, State University of New York College of Optometry, New York City, New York, United States.
Robert M McPeekDepartment of Biological and Vision Sciences, State University of New York College of Optometry, New York City, New York, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9052-100X

Funding

Saccade Target Selection in Naturalistic Visual SearchR01EY030669 · NEI · STATE COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY · PI ROBERT M MCPEEK, GREGORY J ZELINSKY · 2019 to 2026
$4.2M
HHS | NIH | National Eye Institute (NEI) R01-EY030669NEI NIH HHS R01 EY030669
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been suggested that, during difficult visual search tasks involving time pressure and multiple saccades, inhibitory tagging helps to facilitate efficient saccade target selection by reducing responses to objects in the scene once they have been searched and rejected. The superior colliculus (SC) is a midbrain structure involved in target selection, and recent findings suggest an influence of inhibitory tagging on SC activity. Precisely how, and by how much, inhibitory tagging influences target selection by SC neurons, however, is unclear. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to characterize and quantify the influence of inhibitory tagging on target selection in the SC. Rhesus monkeys performed a visual search task involving time pressure and multiple saccades. Early in the fixation period between saccades in the context of this task, a subset of SC neurons reliably discriminated the stimulus selected as the next saccade goal, consistent with a role in target selection. Discrimination occurred earlier and was more robust, however, when unselected stimuli in the search array had been previously fixated on the same trial. This indicates that inhibitory tagging both speeds and strengthens saccade target selection in the SC during multisaccade search. The results provide constraints on models of target selection based on SC activity.

Indexed as

Superior ColliculiVisual PerceptionNeuronsPhotic StimulationSaccadesinhibitory taggingsaccadessuperior colliculustarget selection

Identifiers

PMID38292000
PMCPMC11305629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.