Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38291898›Full record

ArticleInterdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2024

Target flow deviations on the cardiopulmonary bypass cause postoperative delirium in cardiothoracic surgery-a retrospective study evaluating temporal fluctuations of perfusion data.

Johannes Krefting, Hagen Gorki, Markus Hoenicka, Günter Albrecht, Robert Kraft, Andreas Liebold

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Johannes KreftingDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7755-0954
Hagen GorkiDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8395-7593
Markus HoenickaDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0986-6340
Günter AlbrechtDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.
Robert KraftDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.
Andreas LieboldDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9687-1841

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPostoperative delirium (POD) is common, costly and associated with long-term morbidity and increased mortality. We conducted a cohort study to assess the contribution of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) to the development of POD by means of algorithm-based data processing.

methodsA database was compiled from 3 datasets of patients who underwent cardiac surgery between 2014 and 2019: intensive care unit discharge files, CPB protocols and medical quality management records. Following data extraction and structuring using novel algorithms, missing data were imputed. Ten independent imputations were analysed by multiple logistic regression with stepwise deletion of factors to arrive at a minimal adequate model.

resultsPOD was diagnosed in 456/3163 patients (14.4%). In addition to known demographic risk factors and comorbidities like male sex, age, carotid disease, acute kidney failure and diabetes mellitus, cardiopulmonary parameters like total blood volume at the CPB [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.001; confidence interval (CI) 1.1001-1.002] were independent predictors of POD. Higher values of the minimal blood flow were associated with a lower risk of POD (AOR 0.993; CI 0.988-0.997). Flow rates at least 30% above target did emerge in the minimal adequate model as a potential risk factor, but the confidence interval suggested a lack of statistical significance (AOR 1.819; 95% CI: 0.955-3.463).

conclusionsCPB data processing proved to be a useful tool for obtaining compact information to better identify the roles of individual operational states. Strict adherence to perfusion limits along with tighter control of blood flow and acid-base balance during CPB may help to further decrease the risk of POD.

Indexed as

Algorithm-based data processingCardiac surgeryCardiopulmonary bypassPostoperative deliriumTarget flow deviations

Identifiers

PMID38291898
PMCPMC10853608
OpenAlexW4391401104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.