Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38291890›Full record

ArticleNeurorehabilitation and neural repair2024

Measuring Neuroplasticity in Response to Cardiovascular Exercise in People With Stroke: A Critical Perspective.

Bernat De Las Heras, Lynden Rodrigues, Jacopo Cristini, Kevin Moncion, Michelle Ploughman, Ada Tang, Joyce Fung, Marc Roig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bernat De Las HerasMemory and Motor Rehabilitation Laboratory (MEMORY-LAB), Jewish Rehabilitation Hospital, Laval, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8183-4696
Lynden RodriguesMemory and Motor Rehabilitation Laboratory (MEMORY-LAB), Jewish Rehabilitation Hospital, Laval, QC, Canada.
Jacopo CristiniMemory and Motor Rehabilitation Laboratory (MEMORY-LAB), Jewish Rehabilitation Hospital, Laval, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5371-2023
Kevin MoncionSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9556-1630
Michelle PloughmanRecovery and Performance Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4594-0077
Ada TangSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6641-4017
Joyce FungSchool of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Marc RoigMemory and Motor Rehabilitation Laboratory (MEMORY-LAB), Jewish Rehabilitation Hospital, Laval, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRehabilitative treatments that promote neuroplasticity are believed to improve recovery after stroke. Animal studies have shown that cardiovascular exercise (CE) promotes neuroplasticity but the effects of this intervention on the human brain and its implications for the functional recovery of patients remain unclear. The use of biomarkers has enabled the assessment of cellular and molecular events that occur in the central nervous system after brain injury. Some of these biomarkers have proven to be particularly valuable for the diagnosis of severity, prognosis of recovery, as well as for measuring the neuroplastic response to different treatments after stroke.

objectivesTo provide a critical analysis on the current evidence supporting the use of neurophysiological, neuroimaging, and blood biomarkers to assess the neuroplastic response to CE in individuals poststroke.

resultsMost biomarkers used are responsive to the effects of acute and chronic CE interventions, but the response appears to be variable and is not consistently associated with functional improvements. Small sample sizes, methodological variability, incomplete information regarding patient's characteristics, inadequate standardization of training parameters, and lack of reporting of associations with functional outcomes preclude the quantification of the neuroplastic effects of CE poststroke using biomarkers.

conclusionConsensus on the optimal biomarkers to monitor the neuroplastic response to CE is currently lacking. By addressing critical methodological issues, future studies could advance our understanding of the use of biomarkers to measure the impact of CE on neuroplasticity and functional recovery in patients with stroke.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular SystemStrokeStroke RehabilitationAnimalsBiomarkersHumansNeuronal PlasticityBiomarkersbiomarkerscardiovascular exerciseneuroplasticityrecoverystroke

Identifiers

PMID38291890
PMCPMC10976460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.