ArticleBiophysical journal2024
Residue coevolution and mutational landscape for OmpR and NarL response regulator subfamilies.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing the functional roles of coevolving PHD finger residues.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DNA-binding response regulators (DBRRs) are a broad class of proteins that operate in tandem with their partner kinase proteins to form two-component signal transduction systems in bacteria. Typical DBRRs are composed of two domains where the conserved N-terminal domain accepts transduced signals and the evolutionarily diverse C-terminal domain binds to DNA. These domains are assumed to be functionally independent, and hence recombination of the two domains should yield novel DBRRs of arbitrary input/output response, which can be used as biosensors. This idea has been proved to be successful in some cases; yet, the error rate is not trivial. Improvement of the success rate of this technique requires a deeper understanding of the linker-domain and inter-domain residue interactions, which have not yet been thoroughly examined. Here, we studied residue coevolution of DBRRs of the two main subfamilies (OmpR and NarL) using large collections of bacterial amino acid sequences to extensively investigate the evolutionary signatures of linker-domain and inter-domain residue interactions. Coevolutionary analysis uncovered evolutionarily selected linker-domain and inter-domain residue interactions of known experimental structures, as well as previously unknown inter-domain residue interactions. We examined the possibility of these inter-domain residue interactions as contacts that stabilize an inactive conformation of the DBRR where DNA binding is inhibited for both subfamilies. The newly gained insights on linker-domain/inter-domain residue interactions and shared inactivation mechanisms improve the understanding of the functional mechanism of DBRRs, providing clues to efficiently create functional DBRR-based biosensors. Additionally, we show the feasibility of applying coevolutionary landscape models to predict the functionality of domain-swapped DBRR proteins. The presented result demonstrates that sequence information can be used to filter out bioengineered DBRR proteins that are predicted to be nonfunctional due to a high negative predictive value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.