Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38291458›Full record

ReviewCell communication and signaling : CCS2024

Prokaryotic microvesicles Ortholog of eukaryotic extracellular vesicles in biomedical fields.

Halimeh Mobarak, Farzin Javid, Maryam Taghavi Narmi, Narges Mardi, Fatemeh Sadeghsoltani, Parisa Khanicheragh, Samaneh Narimani, Mahdi Mahdipour, Emel Sokullu, Ferzane Valioglu and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readVideo-Audio MediaReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell communication and signaling : CCS, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Editorial: Decoding cell fate: the critical roles of extracellular vesicles.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. State of the Art on the Role ofMicroorganisms · 2024
    Review
  15. Functionality of lyophilized osteoinductive EVs: a mechanistic study.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Halimeh MobarakDepartment of Applied Cell Sciences, Faculty of Advanced Medical Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Farzin JavidDepartment of Applied Cell Sciences, Faculty of Advanced Medical Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Maryam Taghavi NarmiDepartment of Applied Cell Sciences, Faculty of Advanced Medical Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Narges MardiBiotechnology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Fatemeh SadeghsoltaniDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Parisa KhanicheraghStudent Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Samaneh NarimaniStem Cell Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Mahdi MahdipourStem Cell Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Emel SokulluBiophysics Department, Koç University School of Medicine, Rumeli Feneri, 34450, Sariyer, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ferzane ValiogluTechnology Development Zones Management CO, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey.
Reza RahbarghaziDepartment of Applied Cell Sciences, Faculty of Advanced Medical Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. Rezarahbardvm@gmail.com.
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences · IRKoç University · TRSakarya University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Every single cell can communicate with other cells in a paracrine manner via the production of nano-sized extracellular vesicles. This phenomenon is conserved between prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. In eukaryotic cells, exosomes (Exos) are the main inter-cellular bioshuttles with the potential to carry different signaling molecules. Likewise, bacteria can produce and release Exo-like particles, namely microvesicles (MVs) into the extracellular matrix. Bacterial MVs function with diverse biological properties and are at the center of attention due to their inherent therapeutic properties. Here, in this review article, the comparable biological properties between the eukaryotic Exos and bacterial MVs were highlighted in terms of biomedical application. Video Abstract.

Indexed as

Cell-Derived MicroparticlesExosomesExtracellular VesiclesExtracellular MatrixSignal TransductionBacterial microvesiclesBiological propertiesBiomedical applicationsEukaryotic cellsExosomesProkaryotic cells

Identifiers

PMID38291458
PMCPMC10826215
OpenAlexW4391361625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.