Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38291367›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2024

Unveiling promising breast cancer biomarkers: an integrative approach combining bioinformatics analysis and experimental verification.

Ali Golestan, Ahmad Tahmasebi, Nafiseh Maghsoodi, Seyed Nooreddin Faraji, Cambyz Irajie, Amin Ramezani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Potential Role ofClinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ali GolestanDepartment of Medical Biotechnology, School of Advanced Medical Sciences and Technologies, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Ahmad TahmasebiInstitute of Biotechnology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
Nafiseh MaghsoodiDepartment of Medical Biotechnology, School of Advanced Medical Sciences and Technologies, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Seyed Nooreddin FarajiDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Cambyz IrajieDepartment of Medical Biotechnology, School of Advanced Medical Sciences and Technologies, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Amin RamezaniDepartment of Medical Biotechnology, School of Advanced Medical Sciences and Technologies, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. aramezani@sums.ac.ir.
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences · IRShiraz University · IR

Funding

Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 24453
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer remains a significant health challenge worldwide, necessitating the identification of reliable biomarkers for early detection, accurate prognosis, and targeted therapy. MATERIALS AND

methodsBreast cancer RNA expression data from the TCGA database were analyzed to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs). The top 500 up-regulated DEGs were selected for further investigation using random forest analysis to identify important genes. These genes were evaluated based on their potential as diagnostic biomarkers, their overexpression in breast cancer tissues, and their low median expression in normal female tissues. Various validation methods, including online tools and quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR), were used to confirm the potential of the identified genes as breast cancer biomarkers.

resultsThe study identified four overexpressed genes (CACNG4, PKMYT1, EPYC, and CHRNA6) among 100 genes with higher importance scores. qRT-PCR analysis confirmed the significant upregulation of these genes in breast cancer patients compared to normal samples.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that CACNG4, PKMYT1, EPYC, and CHRNA6 may serve as valuable biomarkers for breast cancer diagnosis, and PKMYT1 may also have prognostic significance. Furthermore, CACNG4, CHRNA6, and PKMYT1 show promise as potential therapeutic targets. These findings have the potential to advance diagnostic methods and therapeutic approaches for breast cancer.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsComputational BiologyFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMembrane ProteinsPrognosisProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesProtein-Tyrosine KinasesUp-RegulationBiomarkers, TumorMembrane ProteinsPKMYT1 protein, humanProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesProtein-Tyrosine KinasesBioinformatic analysisBiomarker identificationBreast cancerDifferentially expressed genesqRT-PCR

Identifiers

PMID38291367
PMCPMC10829368
OpenAlexW4392788616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.