Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38291364›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2024

CCL-DTI: contributing the contrastive loss in drug-target interaction prediction.

Alireza Dehghan, Karim Abbasi, Parvin Razzaghi, Hossein Banadkuki, Sajjad Gharaghani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alireza DehghanDepartment of Bioinformatics, Kish International Campus, University of Tehran, Kish, 1417614411, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2284-2682
Karim AbbasiLaboratory of System Biology, Bioinformatics and Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (LBB&AI), Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Kharazmi University, Tehran, 1417614411, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2135-8864
Parvin RazzaghiDepartment of Computer Science and Information Technology, Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences (IASBS), Zanjan, 4513766731, Iran. p.razzaghi@iasbs.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7031-4609
Hossein BanadkukiLaboratory of Bioinformatics and Drug Design (LBD), Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Tehran, Tehran, 1417614411, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-8102-1475
Sajjad GharaghaniLaboratory of Bioinformatics and Drug Design (LBD), Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Tehran, Tehran, 1417614411, Iran. s.gharaghani@ut.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5468-4258

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Drug-Target Interaction (DTI) prediction uses a drug molecule and a protein sequence as inputs to predict the binding affinity value. In recent years, deep learning-based models have gotten more attention. These methods have two modules: the feature extraction module and the task prediction module. In most deep learning-based approaches, a simple task prediction loss (i.e., categorical cross entropy for the classification task and mean squared error for the regression task) is used to learn the model. In machine learning, contrastive-based loss functions are developed to learn more discriminative feature space. In a deep learning-based model, extracting more discriminative feature space leads to performance improvement for the task prediction module.

resultsIn this paper, we have used multimodal knowledge as input and proposed an attention-based fusion technique to combine this knowledge. Also, we investigate how utilizing contrastive loss function along the task prediction loss could help the approach to learn a more powerful model. Four contrastive loss functions are considered: (1) max-margin contrastive loss function, (2) triplet loss function, (3) Multi-class N-pair Loss Objective, and (4) NT-Xent loss function. The proposed model is evaluated using four well-known datasets: Wang et al. dataset, Luo's dataset, Davis, and KIBA datasets.

conclusionsAccordingly, after reviewing the state-of-the-art methods, we developed a multimodal feature extraction network by combining protein sequences and drug molecules, along with protein-protein interaction networks and drug-drug interaction networks. The results show it performs significantly better than the comparable state-of-the-art approaches.

Indexed as

KnowledgeMachine LearningAmino Acid SequenceDrug InteractionsEntropyContrastive loss functionDrug discoveryDrug–target interactionMultimodal deep learning

Identifiers

PMID38291364
PMCPMC11264960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.