Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38291298›Full record

ArticleNature medicine2024

Integration of AI in healthcare requires an interoperable digital data ecosystem.

Kenneth D Mandl, Daniel Gottlieb, Joshua C Mandel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The current state of electronic health records across Canada: an environmental scan and interoperability maturity assessment.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. A standards-based approach to digital health research: implementing the people heart study.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Adoption of Digital Therapeutics in Europe.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kenneth D MandlComputational Health Informatics Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. kenneth_mandl@harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9781-0477
Daniel GottliebComputational Health Informatics Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Joshua C MandelComputational Health Informatics Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Instrumenting the Delivery System for a Genomics Research Information CommonsU01TR002623 · NCATS · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI MANDL, KENNETH D. · 2019 to 2024
$8.6M
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) U01TR002623U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (Health information technology) 90AX0022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDelivery of Health Care

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.